MHB How can we approach a seemingly senseless binomial expansion problem?

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

I've come across this problem and I think I've observed a pattern when I tried to solve it by using the method of comparison with some lower values of the exponents, but then I just couldn't deduce the answer to the problem because the pattern suggests that I can't. Here is the problem along with my attempt and my question is, am I approaching the problem incorrectly and also, I am wondering what's the point of asking this type of seemingly "senseless" problem under a challenging problems section? (Yes, I found this problem in the challenging problems from a site whose name I don't even recall.)

Problem:

If $$a=(\sqrt{5}+2)^{101}=b+p$$, where $b$ is an integer, $0<p<1$, evaluate $ap$.

Attempt:

Let $$a=(\sqrt{5}+2)^n=b+p$$

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 500"]
[TR]
[TD]$n$[/TD]
[TD]$$a=(\sqrt{5}+2)^n=b+p$$[/TD]
[TD]$ap$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^1$[/TD]
[TD]1.414213562[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^3$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999762[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^5$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999373888[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^7$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999929280362[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^9$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999956716794758[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^{11}$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999886821525305828144[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

I noticed that the value of $ap$ deceases at a very small rate and it just is unsafe to say at this point that the value $ap$ that we're looking for in the expansion $$a=(\sqrt{5}+2)^{101}=b+p$$ approaches 1. What do you think?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey anemone[/color]! :)

It appears you've made a mistake for n=1:
$$(\sqrt 5 + 2)\{(\sqrt 5 + 2)\} = (\sqrt 5 + 2)(\sqrt 5 - 2) = 1$$

As for your other results, I'd say they are simply 1 instead of 0.9999...
The difference is caused by rounding errors in your calculator.

It appears that for higher powers the $\sqrt 5$ is canceled.
For n=3 we get:
$$(\sqrt 5 + 2)^3\{(\sqrt 5 + 2)^3\} = (17\sqrt 5 + 38)(17\sqrt 5 - 38) = 17^2\cdot 5 - 38^2 = 1$$

What strikes me is the resemblance to the golden ratio number.
$$\varphi = \frac {1+\sqrt 5} {2}$$
$$2+\sqrt 5 = 2\varphi + 1$$
 
If we take

a=(√5+2)^101

and b = (√5-2)^101

and expand both we see that the terms with odd power of (√5) shall be same in both and they shall be positive

so a-b =(√5+2)^101 - (√5-2)^101 is integer

now as (√5-2) < 1 so fractional part of (√5+2)^101 is (√5-2)^101 = p

so ap = (√5+2)^101 * (√5-2)^101 = (5-4) ^ 101 = 1
 
I like Serena said:
Hey anemone[/color]! :)

It appears you've made a mistake for n=1:
$$(\sqrt 5 + 2)\{(\sqrt 5 + 2)\} = (\sqrt 5 + 2)(\sqrt 5 - 2) = 1$$

As for your other results, I'd say they are simply 1 instead of 0.9999...
The difference is caused by rounding errors in your calculator.

It appears that for higher powers the $\sqrt 5$ is canceled.
For n=3 we get:
$$(\sqrt 5 + 2)^3\{(\sqrt 5 + 2)^3\} = (17\sqrt 5 + 38)(17\sqrt 5 - 38) = 17^2\cdot 5 - 38^2 = 1$$

What strikes me is the resemblance to the golden ratio number.
$$\varphi = \frac {1+\sqrt 5} {2}$$
$$2+\sqrt 5 = 2\varphi + 1$$

Thanks for your reply, I like Serena!:)

Oops...you're so right.:o All those values are calculated wrongly as there are rounding errors in the calculations and now I re-do the case for which $n=3$, yes, I get $ap=1$ for that particular case.

Thank you again for spotting my error and hey, now that you mentioned about the golden ratio number, I can tell maybe this is where they got the idea to set this problem up.:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
965
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top