How can we approach a seemingly senseless binomial expansion problem?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Expansion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a binomial expansion problem involving the expression \( a = (\sqrt{5}+2)^{101} = b + p \), where \( b \) is an integer and \( 0 < p < 1 \). Participants explore the nature of \( ap \) and the implications of their calculations, questioning the validity of the problem's setup and the significance of the results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant observes a pattern in the values of \( ap \) as they compute \( a \) for various exponents, suggesting a decreasing trend but expressing uncertainty about its significance.
  • Another participant points out a potential mistake in the calculations for \( n=1 \) and claims that the results are actually 1 rather than values approaching 0.9999 due to rounding errors.
  • A different approach is introduced where \( b = (\sqrt{5}-2)^{101} \) is considered, leading to the conclusion that the fractional part \( p \) can be expressed as \( (\sqrt{5}-2)^{101} \), resulting in \( ap = 1 \).
  • Participants discuss the relationship of the problem to the golden ratio, noting similarities in the expressions involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the interpretation of the problem or the correctness of the calculations. Some participants agree on the final value of \( ap \) being 1 based on a specific approach, while others express uncertainty about the implications of their calculations and the nature of the problem itself.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential rounding errors in calculations and the dependence on the assumptions made regarding the values of \( a \) and \( b \). The discussion remains open regarding the significance of the problem and the methods used to approach it.

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

I've come across this problem and I think I've observed a pattern when I tried to solve it by using the method of comparison with some lower values of the exponents, but then I just couldn't deduce the answer to the problem because the pattern suggests that I can't. Here is the problem along with my attempt and my question is, am I approaching the problem incorrectly and also, I am wondering what's the point of asking this type of seemingly "senseless" problem under a challenging problems section? (Yes, I found this problem in the challenging problems from a site whose name I don't even recall.)

Problem:

If $$a=(\sqrt{5}+2)^{101}=b+p$$, where $b$ is an integer, $0<p<1$, evaluate $ap$.

Attempt:

Let $$a=(\sqrt{5}+2)^n=b+p$$

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 500"]
[TR]
[TD]$n$[/TD]
[TD]$$a=(\sqrt{5}+2)^n=b+p$$[/TD]
[TD]$ap$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^1$[/TD]
[TD]1.414213562[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^3$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999762[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^5$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999373888[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^7$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999929280362[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^9$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999956716794758[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]$(\sqrt{5}+2)^{11}$[/TD]
[TD]0.9999999999999999999999999999999999886821525305828144[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

I noticed that the value of $ap$ deceases at a very small rate and it just is unsafe to say at this point that the value $ap$ that we're looking for in the expansion $$a=(\sqrt{5}+2)^{101}=b+p$$ approaches 1. What do you think?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey anemone[/color]! :)

It appears you've made a mistake for n=1:
$$(\sqrt 5 + 2)\{(\sqrt 5 + 2)\} = (\sqrt 5 + 2)(\sqrt 5 - 2) = 1$$

As for your other results, I'd say they are simply 1 instead of 0.9999...
The difference is caused by rounding errors in your calculator.

It appears that for higher powers the $\sqrt 5$ is canceled.
For n=3 we get:
$$(\sqrt 5 + 2)^3\{(\sqrt 5 + 2)^3\} = (17\sqrt 5 + 38)(17\sqrt 5 - 38) = 17^2\cdot 5 - 38^2 = 1$$

What strikes me is the resemblance to the golden ratio number.
$$\varphi = \frac {1+\sqrt 5} {2}$$
$$2+\sqrt 5 = 2\varphi + 1$$
 
If we take

a=(√5+2)^101

and b = (√5-2)^101

and expand both we see that the terms with odd power of (√5) shall be same in both and they shall be positive

so a-b =(√5+2)^101 - (√5-2)^101 is integer

now as (√5-2) < 1 so fractional part of (√5+2)^101 is (√5-2)^101 = p

so ap = (√5+2)^101 * (√5-2)^101 = (5-4) ^ 101 = 1
 
I like Serena said:
Hey anemone[/color]! :)

It appears you've made a mistake for n=1:
$$(\sqrt 5 + 2)\{(\sqrt 5 + 2)\} = (\sqrt 5 + 2)(\sqrt 5 - 2) = 1$$

As for your other results, I'd say they are simply 1 instead of 0.9999...
The difference is caused by rounding errors in your calculator.

It appears that for higher powers the $\sqrt 5$ is canceled.
For n=3 we get:
$$(\sqrt 5 + 2)^3\{(\sqrt 5 + 2)^3\} = (17\sqrt 5 + 38)(17\sqrt 5 - 38) = 17^2\cdot 5 - 38^2 = 1$$

What strikes me is the resemblance to the golden ratio number.
$$\varphi = \frac {1+\sqrt 5} {2}$$
$$2+\sqrt 5 = 2\varphi + 1$$

Thanks for your reply, I like Serena!:)

Oops...you're so right.:o All those values are calculated wrongly as there are rounding errors in the calculations and now I re-do the case for which $n=3$, yes, I get $ap=1$ for that particular case.

Thank you again for spotting my error and hey, now that you mentioned about the golden ratio number, I can tell maybe this is where they got the idea to set this problem up.:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K