How can we better understand and navigate the complexities of our inner world?

  • Thread starter Thread starter praveen
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread explores the complexities of the "inner world" and "outer world," focusing on how individuals understand and navigate their mental states compared to external realities. Participants discuss concepts related to consciousness, fear, identity, and the tools available for self-exploration and understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while humans excel at exploring the outer world through knowledge and thought, the inner world remains less understood.
  • Fear is proposed as a common issue within the inner world, influencing identity and community affiliations.
  • One participant questions how the mind can solve problems when it is itself a source of those problems.
  • Another viewpoint posits that the mind may be a product of the outer world, lacking independent existence.
  • Conversely, some argue that the brain could be a product of the inner world, with both realms being interconnected aspects of a single dimension.
  • A participant introduces Relational Frame Theory and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as tools that bridge the inner and outer worlds, emphasizing self-organization through paradoxes and metaphors.
  • There is a discussion about the observer-observed relationship in understanding one's mind, highlighting the challenge of self-observation.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the existence of a distinct "mind," suggesting it may be a transient pattern of energy rather than a stable entity.
  • One claim connects the formula "E=mc^2" to the concept of awareness, suggesting a fundamental misunderstanding in contemporary thought regarding the nature of awareness.
  • A participant emphasizes the role of willpower in overcoming inner-world problems, suggesting that individuals can develop this strength to address psychological challenges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion features multiple competing views on the nature of the mind and its relationship to the outer world, with no consensus reached on the best approach to understanding or resolving inner-world issues.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the nature of consciousness, the mind, and the tools for self-exploration, with some limitations in defining terms and concepts clearly.

praveen
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
"Outer World" and "Inner World"

Hi All,

I am opening this thread NOT to ask questions but just to explore with you all on the subject of
"Outer world" and "inner World"

We , Human beings seems to be MASTERS in exploring the Outer World. Outer world I mean by..whatever
out side of "Consciousness" . We seems to solve ANY PROBLEM whether it is a challenge in physics,
chemistry, math ,astronomy ,biology..etc.

To me "knowledge plus thought" seems to play a BIG role in solving & understanding the "outer world".


When coming to "inner World", inner world i mean by "the mind" (not brain), I feel like we didn't succeed
in solving/understanding "inner World" as we succeeded in out world.

I would call the tool to handle "outer world" is "Knowledge plus thought".

what is the tool to handle "Inner World" ? If there is a problem within the mind, how can a mind solves when itself is a problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
praveen said:
If there is a problem within the mind, how can a mind solves when itself is a problem?

Would you be able to give an example of this, so I know what you mean.
 
Lets us take a common problem exist in almost everybody's Inner World (Consciousness) which is "FEAR"...

I see the FEAR as the source of many of our actions...

Why we have accepted a LIFE based on identification with a Nation ( American, Indian...) , religion (Hindu , Christian , Islam...) ?

We want to identify with a community because we are afraid of and then seeking security , protection ??

The above is just one of the example of problems in "Inner World".
 
praveen said:
If there is a problem within the mind, how can a mind solves when itself is a problem?

Maybe the mind is a product of the outer world and actually has no separate individual existence unto itself..
 
And vice versa, maybe the brain is the product of the inner world. Evidently, this is the case according to science. Inner and Outer are like up and down, two aspects of a single thing sometimes called a "dimension".

In recent decades a new tool has been developed which spans both the inner cognitive and external behavioral, Relational Frame Theory. It is the only tool scientifically proven to do so meaningfully and in a consistent and nontrivial manner. It is based on the philosophy of Functional Contextualism, and resembles some asian philosophies.

Out of this research Radical Behaviorists created Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. This utilizes paradoxes and metaphores to explore the mind rather than any particular rational system. You might compare the idea to that of self-organizing systems. A garden is a self-organizing system, which if well arranged will grow well with minimal intervention.

Similarly, by presenting the mind with paradoxes and metaphores, we present it only with an opportunity to interpret them anyway it so desires, and organize itself accordingly. A kind of mirror for the mind if you will. As they say, knowing what the problem is is half the battle. Different kinds of mirrors can be used to facilitate distinct types of growth.

This is also what psychologists have noted in nature. Given enough time and focus on the issues, mental and emotional conflicts tend to be self-correcting. The only real job of the psychologist is to help facilitate the process, to make it easier and hopefully faster.
 
Understanding & knowing of Outer world is done thru observation from ages...

But to understand and to know how ones mind is working, reacting, acting , feeling...what is the method/process to do this ? Here the observer and observed is same ! How the mind to observ itself ?
 
There is a fine line between asking questions and preaching.
 
Many people believe that there is no "mind". What we call the mind is really just an always changing pattern of energy so to speak. So really there is no mind to see. What we see is the temporary and always fleeting thoughts and feelings of the moment and so in that sense we are always seeing the mind.

Also, I think the conscious part of ourselves isn't nearly advanced enough to be able to make sense of how complicated what we are really is.. in the same way that perhaps a person can't visualize 10 dimmensional space.

The problem of how can "the mind" see itself is also like how can "the eye" see itself.
 
The problem is, that the formula "E=mc^2" is the formula for "Mind", better known as "Aware". But to many, they look at "Aware" as a byproduct of "E=mc^2" instead of vice versa. This is the Mother of all problems with todays thinking, and it is holding humanity back from expansion of thought.
 
  • #10
I think the way to overcome "inner-world" problems is through your own will power. A lot of people don't have very strong will power, so they find it hard to solve mental/psychological problems that they might have to face, but that's something that they can work on - if they know how.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K