I How can we observe and measure interacting vacuum?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter victorvmotti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure Vacuum
victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
When studying the QFT, one considers the vacuum state when the field is not excited and therefore no particles are present.

Now for the matter fields this makes sense to me. But what about the radiation field? Suppose we have an arbitrary small volume of space in the universe without any matter particles inside of it. An empty volume of space. But can we say that there are not any photons inside this empty volume?

I mean regardless of where we pick the empty of matter volume in the universe there is some radiation coming to that volume from some galaxy source. Then what is actually the difference between an empty (of matter) space and the interacting vacuum, an empty of on-shell matter and radiation space, that is talked about in the QFT.

I suppose by QFT vacuum we actually mean even there is no excitation of the electromagnetic field and therefore no on-shell photons. But can we have any volume of space at any time through which a real (not virtual) photon doesn't pass?

How can we observe and measure interacting vacuum value when we don't have a cosmic vacuum?

I guess that the answer is:

Because the distance scales that we talk about and calculate in interacting vacuum and vacuum energy in QFT is much much smaller, like 1/1000 of the proton radius, than the distance scales relevant for the cosmic vacuum and the thermal effects energy like CMB, right?

Actually we subtract all the radiation including the CMB from the energy inside of empty cosmic space to obtain experimental data on the value of interacting vacuum energy and compare with the QFT prediction, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For space filled with CMB, I think its energy is ##E=E_{vac}+E_{CMB}## with vacuum energy as default.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Back
Top