MHB How Can Weighting Opponent Ranking Impact Tennis Player Statistics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter itzvenom95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ranking Weight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on developing a formula to weight the "12 Month Median Ranking of Opponent" in tennis player statistics. The goal is to adjust the significance of the "12 Month Service Points Won" based on the opponent's ranking, as a player achieving the same service points against a lower-ranked opponent is considered to perform better. The user seeks a method to quantify this difference, ensuring that the statistics reflect the quality of competition faced by each player. A clear formula is requested to incorporate this weighting effectively. The conversation emphasizes the need for a more nuanced approach to evaluating player performance in relation to their opponents' rankings.
itzvenom95
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have the following table.
Sem Títul2o.jpg

I would like to know how to give an weight to the "12 Month Median Ranking of Opponent" so it changes other two columns depending on how high/low the ranking is.
To put this into perspective, this is regarding tennis players. On the spreadsheet I can have two players facing each other that have the same "12 Month Service Points Won" of 40%. Although Player A has a "12 Month Median Ranking of Opponent" of 300 and Player B of 100. Although the percentages are the same the player who managed to get a 40% "12 Month Service Points Won" against an "12 Month Median Ranking of Opponent" of 100 is extremely better than Player A that managed to get the same 40% against a "12 Month Median Ranking of Opponent" of 300.
I would like a formula to tackle this issue.

Let me know if I wasn't clear on any of my explanation.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's another photo that might help with this problem.

Sem Títul2o.jpg
I would like to come up with a formula that takes the ranking of opponent into account, giving more or less value to the other two columns.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top