How can you prove the number-theoretic equation $\sum_{d|n} \phi(d) = n$?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The number-theoretic equation $$\sum_{d|n} \phi(d) = n$$ is proven through the contributions of forum members Olinguito and castor28. The equation states that the sum of Euler's totient function $\phi(d)$ over all divisors $d$ of a positive integer $n$ equals $n$. Both solutions provided in the discussion effectively demonstrate this relationship using properties of the totient function and divisor summation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler's totient function $\phi(d)$
  • Familiarity with divisor summation notation and concepts
  • Basic knowledge of number theory
  • Experience with mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Euler's totient function $\phi(d)$ in depth
  • Explore divisor functions and their applications in number theory
  • Learn about the Mobius inversion formula and its relevance to divisor sums
  • Investigate advanced proof techniques in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced number theory concepts, particularly those focusing on divisor functions and Euler's totient function.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Give a proof of the number-theoretic equation $$\sum_{d|n} \phi(d) = n$$ where $\phi(d)$ is the number of positive integers $\le d$ and relatively prime to $d$.-----

Remember to read the https://mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to https://mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations to Olinguito and castor28 for their correct solutions.

1. Olinguito's solution.

Let $N=\{1,\ldots,n\}$. For each $d\in N$ such that $d\mid n$, consider the set $N_d=\{r\in N:\gcd(r,n)=d\}$. Now if $s\in N$ and $sd\in N_d$, then $\gcd(sd,n)=d$ and so $\gcd\left(s,\frac nd\right)=1$. Conversely, if $s,sd\in N$ and $\gcd\left(s,\frac nd\right)=1$, then $\gcd(sd,n)=d$ and so $sd\in N_d$. Hence there is a bijection between $N_d$ and the set of all $s\in N$ such that $s\le \frac nd$ and $\gcd\left(s,\frac nd\right)=1$. It follows that $\left|N_d\right|=\phi\left(\frac nd\right)$.

Now if $r\in N_{d_1}$ and $r\in N_{d_2}$, then $d_1=\gcd(r,n)=d_2$. Hence the $N_d$ are pairwise disjoint. Moreover, if $r\in N$ then $r\in N_{\gcd(r,n)}$. Hence $\displaystyle\bigcup_{d\mid n}N_d=N$. It follows that
$$n=\sum_{d\mid n}\left|N_d\right|=\sum_{d\mid n}\phi\left(\frac nd\right)=\sum_{d\mid n}\phi(d)$$(since as $d$ ranges over all the divisors of $n$, so does $\frac nd$).


2. castor28's solution.

In a cyclic group of order $n$, each element generates a cyclic subgroup of order $d$ for some $d\mid n$.

The number of generators of that subgroup (the number of elements of order $d$) is $\phi(d)$. As these elements (for all $d\mid n$) account for all the $n$ elements of the group, we have :
$$
\sum_{d|n} \phi(d) = n
$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K