How certain do we have to get about a particle's position ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter B4ssHunter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Position
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the position of particles. It highlights that if a particle's position is known within a range ΔX, this range must be less than one wavelength to maintain probability integrity. The author suggests that a range of less than half a wavelength might be more logical to prevent probabilities from canceling out. The fundamental relationship governing this uncertainty is expressed in the formula (Δx)(Δp) = h, where Δx is the position uncertainty, Δp is the momentum uncertainty, and h is Planck's constant. This exploration emphasizes the complexities of measuring particle positions in quantum physics.
B4ssHunter
Messages
178
Reaction score
4
i was reading brian cox's book about *the quantum universe *
and he said something interesting
if for instance we know that a particle exists in ΔX , then this delta has to be less than one wavelength * he did it with clocks * to know the probability of its existence somewhere else in the universe , because if it was more than one wavelength , probabilities would cancel each other out at this point that i want to know the probability of the existence of the particle at
but i think it would make more sense if it was actually less than HALF a wavelength , because if my certainty in the position of the particle was less than half a wavelengths , then there is going to be no chance that probabilities will cancel out , right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The basic formula is "(\Delta x)(\Delta p)= h) where \Delta x is the uncertainty in the position, \Delta p is the uncertainty in the momentum and "h" is "Plank's constant", about 6.26\times 10^{-34} "Joule seconds".
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K