How close is LQG/SF to Wen's lattice spin models

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lattice Models Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Wen's research demonstrates that a 3D extended lattice spin model can effectively produce fundamental particles such as light, electrons, and gravitons. The discussion centers on comparing Wen's approach with Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) and String Field Theory (SF), questioning the feasibility of adapting LQG/SF to replicate Wen's findings. Additionally, the use of knotty string diagrams in Wen's methodology is noted, highlighting a divergence from traditional LQG techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 3D extended lattice spin models
  • Familiarity with Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) concepts
  • Knowledge of String Field Theory (SF) principles
  • Basic comprehension of knotty string diagrams and higher categorical structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of 3D extended lattice spin models in particle physics
  • Explore the relationship between Loop Quantum Gravity and String Field Theory
  • Investigate the role of knotty string diagrams in modern algebraic structures
  • Examine case studies where LQG/SF has been adapted to other theoretical frameworks
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and anyone interested in the intersection of lattice models and particle physics.

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
Wen's papers purport to show that given a 3D extended lattice spin model, the emergence of light, electrons, gravitons and others should work well. How similar is what he is doing with what LQG and SF have done?

How hard would it be to construct a verion of LQG/SF that reproduces all of Wen's results in creating SM particles and gravitons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ensabah6 said:
Wen's papers purport to show that given a 3D extended lattice spin model, the emergence of light, electrons, gravitons and others should work well. How similar is what he is doing with what LQG and SF have done?

Wen's papers use knotty string diagrams, common in modern algebras arising from higher categorical structures. I don't see what that has to do with LQG.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K