Are there any graphene planck-scale quantum gravity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential relationship between graphene's honeycomb lattice structure and theories of quantum gravity (QG), particularly in the context of loop quantum gravity (LQG), spin foam (SF), causal dynamical triangulation (CDT), and M-theory. The paper by Mecklenburg and Regan suggests that the pseudospin in graphene may indicate that space is composed of discrete points arranged in a non-cubic lattice, possibly hexagonal. This concept raises questions about the nature of spin and its implications for particle physics, specifically regarding quarks and leptons. The conversation also touches on the limitations of extending the Feynman checkerboard model to four-dimensional spacetime.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum gravity theories such as loop quantum gravity (LQG) and M-theory.
  • Familiarity with the Dirac equation and its implications for particle physics.
  • Knowledge of graphene's electronic properties and its honeycomb lattice structure.
  • Concept of pseudospin and its significance in condensed matter physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of loop quantum gravity on the structure of spacetime.
  • Study the role of pseudospin in graphene and its effects on electronic properties.
  • Explore the Feynman checkerboard model and its limitations in higher dimensions.
  • Investigate the relationship between discrete spacetime models and quantum gravity theories.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, materials scientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of condensed matter physics and fundamental theories of the universe.

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
Are there any "graphene" Planck-scale quantum gravity?

I'm wondering if there is any QG or emergent structure that is "graphene" due to suggestions from this paper, specifically,

does LQG, SF, CDT,M-theory, etc., suggest space consists of discrete points arranged in a non-cubic lattice?

http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3715
Spin and the Honeycomb Lattice: Lessons from Graphene
Matthew Mecklenburg, B. C. Regan
(Submitted on 19 Mar 2010)
Spin-1/2 particles such as the electron are described by the Dirac equation, which allows for two spin eigenvalues (up or down) and two types of energy eigenvalues (positive or negative, corresponding to the electron and the positron). A model of electrons hopping from carbon atom to carbon atom in graphene's honeycomb lattice gives low-energy electronic excitations that obey a relation formally identical to a two-dimensional Dirac equation. In graphene the spin equivalent, termed pseudospin, arises from the degeneracy introduced by the honeycomb lattice's two inequivalent atomic sites per unit cell. Previously it has been thought that the usual electron spin and the pseudospin indexing the graphene sublattice state are merely analogues. Here we show that the pseudospin is also a real, intrinsic angular momentum. This identification explains the suppression of electron backscattering in carbon nanotubes and the angular dependence of light absorption by graphene. Furthermore, it suggests that the half-integer spin of the quarks and leptons could derive from hidden substructure, not of the particles themselves, but rather of the space in which these particles live. In other words, the existence of spin might be interpreted as evidence that space consists of discrete points arranged in a non-cubic lattice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


By non-cubic they suggest hex. packing.
jal
 


How is what they are proposing any different from the Feynman checkerboard model (also 2-d)?

As soon as I saw 2-d hopping reproducing Dirac, that is what pops to mind. And that doesn't require "two inequivalent atomic sites per unit cell".

Anyway, in answer to your question:
There are problems extending the checkboard models to 4-d spacetime. So that would have to be resolved confidently before people would start seriously considering curved spacetime and approaching a quantum gravity theory from this angle.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K