How Did the Official's Wife Fit $80,000 in Her Underwear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the unusual scenario of a top country official's wife hiding $80,000 in her underwear. Participants explore various humorous and speculative angles regarding the practicality and implications of such an act, touching on themes of concealment, currency denominations, and societal norms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants humorously suggest that the money was hidden in a bra, while others question the practicality of such a hiding place.
  • There is speculation about the type of banknotes used and how that affects the volume of cash that could be concealed.
  • One participant proposes that it might make more sense to invest money in assets that draw interest rather than hiding cash.
  • Several comments reflect on the absurdity of the situation, with references to alternative hiding methods that might be more effective.
  • Participants discuss the implications of currency denominations, noting that the largest legal denomination in the US is $100, which leads to comments about the physical bulk of cash.
  • There are humorous remarks about the potential consequences of hiding cash in unconventional ways, including references to absorbency and the fragility of paper money.
  • One participant corrects a previous claim about the largest denominations in circulation, noting that larger bills exist but are no longer printed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally engage in light-hearted banter and speculation without reaching a consensus on the practicality or implications of hiding money in such a manner. Multiple competing views and humorous interpretations remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some comments reflect assumptions about the effectiveness of various hiding methods and the nature of currency, which may not be universally applicable. The discussion also includes references to societal norms regarding wealth concealment that are not fully explored.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in humorous takes on societal behaviors, discussions about currency, or those curious about unconventional methods of wealth concealment may find this thread engaging.

Where id she hide the $80,000?

  • Bra :)

    Votes: 9 50.0%
  • Panties :(

    Votes: 9 50.0%

  • Total voters
    18
Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,137
Reaction score
21
Wife of top country official hides $80,000 in her underwear.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40162304/ns/us_news"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
LOL! :smile:
 
Pssst, bra of course... But it actually depends! :biggrin:
 
That was the big story on the news in DC last night. The transcripts being read on TV were too funny. :smile:
 
I guess a lot depends on the banknotes used.
 
But doesn't it make sense to put the money where it will draw the most interest?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
But doesn't it make sense to put the money where it will draw the most interest?

:smile:

Am I the only one whose first thought was "solid gold suppository"? :rolleyes:
 
She must have a pair of MIH's "booty pants".
 
I'm sitting on a fortune. :)
 
  • #10
Math Is Hard said:
I'm sitting on a fortune. :)

Oh, my gorgeous friend, the number of responses that I could make to that statement... anyone of which would get me banned...
 
  • #11
Danger said:
:smile:

Am I the only one whose first thought was "solid gold suppository"? :rolleyes:

I can almost guarantee that you were!

That sounds like some ancient medicine or method of execution for royalty... not sure which.

Oh, and she did hide it in the bra... what ever happened to hidden compartments, floorboards, burying **** in the yard? Now we have cash in freezers, bras, and other places cops are GOING TO LOOK! Cops are hungry, and once they finish cleaning out the freezer, they get a little horny so these hiding places are clearly sub-par.ALL kidding aside... take a hint crooks: do what rich people do... buy art or jewels/jewelery... then just wear it.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Danger said:
Oh, my gorgeous friend, the number of responses that I could make to that statement... anyone of which would get me banned...

Glad to know I'm not the only one...
 
  • #13
Since the largest legal denomination in the US is $100, that must have been SOME wad!
 
  • #14
turbo-1 said:
that must have been SOME wad!

...

'Nuff said."
 
  • #15
And that's called dollar inflation, literally...
 
  • #16
turbo-1 said:
Since the largest legal denomination in the US is $100, that must have been SOME wad!

That's why fungible assets like precious metals or uncut stones are so desirable, which also carry a higher value density than cash.
 
  • #17
jobyts said:
And that's called dollar inflation, literally...

Nah, that's what happens when your $80K suppository gets wet and blows up. :biggrin:

Damn that high linen content in paper money... so absorbent.
 
  • #18
A trivia:

If the dollar were made of litmus paper, what would be the color of the notes the FBI seized?
 
  • #19
turbo-1 said:
Since the largest legal denomination in the US is $100, that must have been SOME wad!

Not true. There's a number of larger bills up to $10,000 in circulation. Larger denominations haven't been printed since 1945, but they are still legal tender.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K