How Do 1-Dimensional Strings Transform into Point Particles in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WaveJumper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Click For Summary
1-dimensional strings in physics are conceptualized as zero-dimensional point particles due to their extremely small size, approaching the Planck length. Energy is considered a real entity rather than just a mathematical construct, with energy and mass being interchangeable forms. The notion of a string vibrating is not limited to one dimension; it actually vibrates across multiple dimensions, typically 10 or 11 in string theory. The depiction of strings as one-dimensional is a simplification, as they inherently exist in a higher-dimensional framework. Understanding these concepts requires a grasp of advanced mathematical principles and the definitions of dimensions in theoretical physics.
WaveJumper
Messages
771
Reaction score
1
My question is simple and straight forward - how does a 1-dimensional string "convert" to a zero-dimensional point particle?

And another one - for the purposes of physics, energy is not a physical object but an abstract mathematical construct. So how can a string of energy have a definite physical size(although it's the lowest tolerated by mathematical physics size - the Planck length)?

Oops, here's another one - How on Earth can a 1-dimensional string vibrate without employing a 2nd dimension? The drawings of this alleged physical object I've seen, all portray a 2-dimensional string(string is curved).

What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you can't have a string in 1 dimension can you? i mean that would just be a line, you would need at least two dimensions to have a string, but what does this have to do with string theory, don't they state that there is 10 or 11 dimensions depending on if its super symmetry. forgive me if I am wrong but that's what I thought, I am sure someone will clarify.
 
You are missing a definition of dimension. Minimum length, minimum size.
see https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=513
jal
 
Last edited by a moderator:
a one dimensional string was thought of as a zero dimensional point particle because of how small it was, and the more advanced mathematics behind the theory of strings. And energy is not a mathematical construct, its a real thing. You can have pure energy. Energy and mass are the same thing, just different forms. And just like you can have an object that we see every day of mass, you can have a string of zero mass and pure energy, like a photon or a string of energy. Also a string isn't really a one dimensional object, its just pictured that way, when really it is an object that vibrates in 10+ dimensions.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K