How Do Centralizers and Generators Organize Group Elements?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Locoism
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generators
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of centralizers and generators within group theory, focusing on their definitions, properties, and visualizations. Participants explore specific examples, particularly using the symmetric group S3, to illustrate their points and clarify understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about centralizers and generators, questioning if the centralizer of a subgroup is akin to the largest abelian subgroup of the group.
  • Another participant clarifies that the centralizer of a subgroup commutes with every element of that subgroup, but it does not necessarily have to be abelian.
  • A participant proposes using the group S3 as an example to investigate the properties of centralizers, demonstrating that the center of S3 is trivial due to its non-abelian nature.
  • It is noted that as the size of the subgroup decreases, the size of its centralizer can increase, suggesting a relationship between the abelian nature of the subgroup and its centralizer.
  • Participants discuss that if a subgroup is abelian, its centralizer will contain all of its elements, while a non-abelian subgroup will not have all its elements in its centralizer.
  • There is a mention that the center of a group is always abelian, but it may not be the largest abelian subgroup, as illustrated with the dihedral group D4.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the concepts, with some agreeing on definitions while others raise questions and examples that highlight complexities and nuances. No consensus is reached on the visualization or broader implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding and the abstract nature of the concepts discussed. There are unresolved questions regarding the notation and specific properties of centralizers and generators.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of group theory, particularly those seeking to understand centralizers, generators, and their implications in various groups.

Locoism
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble grasping the concept of centralizers and generators. Is there any way to visualize these groups?

Edit:
For example, the centralizer of S in G (S is a subgp of G) is given by
Z(S) ={g ε G : gh = hg for all h ε G}

Does that just mean it is like the biggest abelian subgroup of G?
I'm pretty unclear on the concept of generator, and the notation use.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Locoism said:
I'm having trouble grasping the concept of centralizers and generators. Is there any way to visualize these groups?

Edit:
For example, the centralizer of S in G (S is a subgp of G) is given by
Z(S) ={g ε G : gh = hg for all h ε G}

Does that just mean it is like the biggest abelian subgroup of G?
I'm pretty unclear on the concept of generator, and the notation use.

the center of a group is the subgroup that commutes with every element of the group. The centralizer of a subgroup is the group that commutes with every element of the subgroup.


the centralizer does not need to be abelian. For instance the centralizer of the center is the entire group.
 
let's pick a group, and see what we get for some different test values.

we'll pick S3, it's small, and non-abelian, so maybe we'll learn something.

now (1 2)(1 3) = (1 3 2), while (1 3)(1 2) = (1 2 3), so neither (1 2) or (1 3)

can be in the center of S3.

(1 2)(1 2 3) = (2 3), while (1 2 3)(1 2) = (1 3), so (1 2 3) isn't in the center.

(1 2)(1 3 2) = (1 3), (1 3 2)(1 2) = ( 2 3), so (1 3 2) isn't in the center.

(1 2)(2 3) = (1 2 3), (2 3)(1 2) = (1 3 2), so (2 3) isn't in the center.

so Z(S3) is just the identity (S3 is VERY non-abelian, hardly anything commutes).

let's see what happens if we try to centralize a smaller set.

let's choose H = {1, (1 2 3), (1 3 2)}.

straight-away we see that (1 2), (1, 3) and (2, 3) aren't in Z(H), from our investigations into the center.

but (1 2 3)^-1 = (1 3 2), and everything commutes with its inverse, so

Z(H) = H.

note that if we pick S = {1}, everything commutes with the identity, so Z({1}) = S3.

notice that the smaller S gets, the bigger Z(S) got. Z(S) is sort of a way of telling:

"how abelian is S compared to the rest of G".

the identity subgroup is VERY abelian, so it makes sense that Z({1}) is big. S3 is not very abelian, so it makes sense Z(S3) is small. {1,(1 2 3),(1 3 2)} is sort of "in the middle", everything in it commutes with itself (because it's an abelian subgroup), but it doesn't commute with anything outside of it.

if a subgroup H is abelian, Z(H) will contain all of H, and maybe more.

if a subgroup H is not abelian, Z(H) won't contain all of H.

if the main group G is abelian, of course, Z(H) = G for every subgroup H.

the center of G, Z(G) will always be an abelian group (since everything in it commutes with everything, including its own elements), but it isn't necessarily the largest abelian subgroup of G. for example, in the group D4 =

{1,r,r^2,r^3,s,rs,r^2s,r^3s}, the center is {1,r^2}, but the subgroup {1,r,r^2,r^3} is abelian and is clearly larger.
 
Thank you Deveno that was really helpful. Man this stuff is abstract...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K