How do different track shapes affect the travel time of a mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jan2905
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion analyzes the travel times of a mass moving along three different track shapes: a down-facing parabola (P1), a straight track (P2), and an up-facing parabola (P3). It concludes that the travel time for the straight track (t2) is less than that of both parabolic tracks (t1 and t3), establishing the relationship t2 < t1 = t3. The analysis emphasizes the role of initial horizontal velocity and the conservation of energy in determining the mass's velocity at the end of each track.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly kinematics and energy conservation.
  • Familiarity with parabolic motion and its mathematical representation.
  • Knowledge of frictionless motion and its implications in physics problems.
  • Ability to visualize and analyze different geometric shapes in relation to motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of kinematics in depth, focusing on motion along curved paths.
  • Study the conservation of energy in mechanical systems, particularly in frictionless environments.
  • Investigate the properties of cycloidal paths and their applications in physics.
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of parabolic trajectories and their physical implications.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of motion along varying geometrical paths.

jan2905
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
You will have to use your imagination: 3 tracks are constructed as such... path 1 (P1) is similar to a "down-facing parabola," path 2 (P2) is straight, and path 3 (P3) is similar to an "up-facing parabola." P1 is "uphill," P2 is "through that hill," and P3 "under the hill, beneath P2, and exactly 'oposite' of P1."

Okay! ... A mass m starting at point A (foot of the hill) is projected with the same initial horizontal velocity v along each of the three tracks (negligible friction) sufficient in each case to allow the mass to reach the end of the track at point B (oposite foot of the hill). The masses remain in contact with the tracks throughout their motions. The displacement A-B is the same in each case, and the total path length of P1 and P3 are the equal. If t1, t2, and t3 are the total travel times between A and B for P1, P2, and P3 respetively, what is the relation among these times?



I said intuitively that: t2<t1=t3. correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jan2905 said:
Okay! ... A mass m starting at point A (foot of the hill) is projected with the same initial horizontal velocity v along each of the three tracks (negligible friction) sufficient in each case to allow the mass to reach the end of the track at point B (opposite foot of the hill).
I said intuitively that: t2<t1=t3. correct?

What a nice little problem! Keeping in mind that the initial velocity is horizontal... Consider parabola (1) Will a horizontal velocity enable the mass to slide up over the hill? (If so, will it for ALL parabolas?) Consider parabola (2) The horizontal velocity will enable the mass to slide down the track. With no friction, what does conservation of energy tell you about the velocity of the mass when it reached point B? Finally, what is the relationship between the lengths of the straight line track and the parabolic track.

(As you may deduce from my comments, I have some qualms about the formulation of the problem, but it's still a nice problem. Substitute a cycloid for the parabola and tweak it a little and you have a classic physics problem...)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K