How do differentials really work?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentials Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the manipulation of differentials in the context of solving differential equations. Participants explore the conceptual and mathematical foundations of differentials, derivatives, and the separation of variables, raising questions about the legitimacy of these manipulations and the underlying principles involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the separation of variables in differential equations, questioning the legitimacy of manipulating differentials as if they were normal numbers.
  • Another participant suggests that integrating both sides of an equation with respect to different variables involves substitution, indicating that y and dy are functions of x.
  • A participant explains that while derivatives are limits, they behave like fractions, allowing for the symbolic treatment of differentials as if they were fractional quantities.
  • Some participants mention nonstandard analysis as a framework for treating differentials as actual quantities, citing pedagogical resources that support this view.
  • One participant proposes that separation of variables can be understood through the chain rule, emphasizing that the manipulation of differentials can be seen as a mnemonic shortcut.
  • Another participant reiterates that dy and dx are limit cases of difference values, asserting that they can be treated as fractions under certain conditions of small error.
  • Concerns are raised about the casual treatment of differentials, with a participant noting that while dy/dx is a limit, dx and dy may not be limits themselves and can be defined as real-valued variables.
  • Several participants express agreement with the points raised, indicating a shared uncertainty about the treatment of differentials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express uncertainty and confusion regarding the manipulation of differentials, with multiple competing views on the legitimacy and interpretation of these manipulations. No consensus is reached on the foundational principles governing differentials.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference the need for careful consideration of the accuracy and limits of differentials, highlighting that the equations may hold true with arbitrarily small errors. There are also mentions of unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the definitions of differentials.

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
I have quite some trouble thinking why we are allowed to manipulate differentials as we see fit when solving differential equations. I usually think of the derivative as the fundamental object upon which differentials are based. With this in mind I wince when I see derivatives appear separately, as in separation of variables when solving differential equations.

For example, consider \frac {dy}{dx} = ky
We would "separate" the variables as follows: \frac {dy}{y} = k dx
And then we would integrate both sides... \int \frac {dy}{y} = \int k dx

What I don't understand is what allows us to separate the variables... since when are we allowed to multiply and divide both sides of an equation by a differential? I thought differentials were not like normal numbers, and you're not allowed to play with them unless some theorem specifically allows you to do so?
Also, why are we allowed to integrate both sides of the equation with respect to different variables?

I appreciate any help/advice. Thanks!

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bipolarity said:
Also, why are we allowed to integrate both sides of the equation with respect to different variables?

You're not really integrating the y side in terms of y, because y and dy are functions of x. You're using substitution. For example, if y=C e^{k x}, then \frac{dy}{y}=\frac{C k e^{k x} dx}{C e^{k x}}=k dx.

As for the rest. I'm as lost as you are. I had a thread on this a long time ago. I'm looking for it now.
 
Roughly speaking, the idea is this: the derivative is defined as
\frac{df}{dx}(a)= lim_{x\to a}\frac{f(x)- f(a)}{x- a}
so that, while the derivative is NOT a fraction, it is the limit of a fraction. You can prove that the derivative "acts" like a fraction, has all the fraction properties, by going back before the limit, using the fraction property and then taking the limit again. That is why we define "dx" and "dy" symbolically and treat dy/dx as a fraction.
 
There are, of course, also perfectly sound ways of treating differentials as actual quantities in nonstandard analysis. And they often have some pedagogical value, like Silvanus Thompson's wonderful book Calculus Made Easy, or if you prefer a more rigorous version Keisler's Elementary Calculus, available free online: http://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html
 
Separation of variables can be explained by the chain rule. If your differential equation is \frac{dy}{dx} = f(x)/g(y) (in your example, f(x)=k and g(y)=1/y) then we can write
g(y) \frac{dy}{dx} dx = f(x)
These are both functions of x (because g(y) = g(y(x))). So integrate them both
\int g(y) \frac{dy}{dx} dx = \int f(x)dx
and the result follows from noting that
\int g(y(x)) \frac{dy}{dx} dx = \int g(y)dy
by doing integration by parts (with the substitution y=y(x)).
Then you can consider the act of separating the variables as just a mnemonic shortcut to avoid a lot of notation
 
As someone said here, dy and dx are limit cases of difference values. They are still differences after all and behaving as fraction. dy/dx just happened to be a famous notation that appears as it is in the books.
 
FAlonso said:
As someone said here, dy and dx are limit cases of difference values. They are still differences after all and behaving as fraction. dy/dx just happened to be a famous notation that appears as it is in the books.

Right.

So the equation is true with arbitrary accuracy/arbitrarily small error for very small values of delta x and delta y and there for it is correct to manipulate them as fractions and correct to equate the integrals. One just needs to remember that these equation are true with arbitrarily small error.
 
Last edited:
lavinia said:
Right.

So the equation is true with arbitrary accuracy/arbitrarily small error for very small values of delta x and delta y and there for it is correct to manipulate them as fractions and correct to equate the integrals. One just needs to remember that these equation are true with arbitrarily small error.

This seems to casual to me. while dy/dx is a limit, dx and dy are not the limits of anything. I've seen dx and dy defined as real valued variables related by:

dy = (dy/dx) dx
 
I agree with pondhockey here.

(Though not necessarily with resurecting a thread from three and a half months ago!)
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
I agree with pondhockey here.

(Though not necessarily with resurecting a thread from three and a half months ago!)

For which I apologize. If it helps the cause, here is a location (as newbie I can't post a link yet) that explains differentials in action, in the context of thermodynamic equations.

//www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=525071&highlight=differential
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
865
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K