How Do Gravitational and Coulomb Potentials Compare for Top and Anti-Top Quarks?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing the gravitational potential energy (PE) and Coulomb potential energy between a top quark and its antiparticle, the anti-top quark. Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of these potential energies in the context of particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to establish a ratio of gravitational to Coulomb potential energy, questioning the sign of the ratio and the nature of the anti-top quark. There is a discussion about the correct formulation of the ratio and the implications of the energies being negative.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the formulation of the ratio. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and properties of the particles involved, as well as the mathematical setup of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definition of the anti-top quark and the implications of the negative signs in potential energy calculations. There is also a mention of the mass values and charge characteristics relevant to the problem.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
I am to find the ratio of the gravitational PE to the Coulomb PE between a [tex]t[/tex] and a [tex]\bar{t}[/tex] quark

I don't know what a [tex]\bar{t}[/tex] quark is, but I am guessing that it is a quark that has a charge opposite of that of the [tex]t[/tex] quark?

I am given that the charges are [tex]+/- \frac{2}{3} e[/tex] and that the mass is 174 GeV/c^2.

I think this is how I should set this question up:

[tex]ratio=-\frac{GMm}{kQq}[/tex]

[tex]ratio=-\frac{2G (174 GeV/c^2)}{k(\frac{2}{3} e) (-\frac{2}{3} e)}[/tex]

is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The ratio should not be negative. The rest of the solution, I think that you're right.[/color]
 
Last edited:
why should the ratio not be negative? and what is a [tex]\bar{t}[/tex] quark?
 
Usually the bar means its the antiparticle. In this case you have the top quark [tex]t[/tex] and the anti-top quark [tex]\bar{t}[/tex]. The ratio of the two energies should be positive because both energies are negative.

Also, the gravitational potential energy is proportional to the product of the masses so you should have the mass squared rather than multiplied by two.
 
Last edited:
oh right, so something like..

[tex]ratio=\frac{G (174 GeV/c^2)^2}{k(\frac{2}{3} e)^2}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K