How Do Holes and Time Influence Calabi-Yau Manifolds in String Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MEKer
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the relationship between holes in Calabi-Yau manifolds and their implications for string theory, particularly in the context of dimensions and time. The author proposes a framework where the number of holes in Calabi-Yau manifolds could range from 8 to 11, influenced by the three observable dimensions and particle families. Additionally, the concept of time is examined as a potential determinant in defining these holes, suggesting that "fake holes" exist without the passage of time. The discussion raises questions about the connection between the Higgs Field and Calabi-Yau shapes, emphasizing the need for further exploration of how these concepts integrate with the Standard Model of particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Calabi-Yau manifolds in string theory
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Knowledge of dimensions in theoretical physics
  • Concept of time as a physical dimension
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of Calabi-Yau manifolds
  • Study the implications of time in string theory frameworks
  • Explore the relationship between the Higgs Field and Calabi-Yau shapes
  • Examine the role of dimensions in the unification of forces in physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in geometry, and researchers focused on string theory and particle physics, particularly those interested in the interplay between geometry and fundamental forces.

MEKer
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
2 odd lines of thought have been bothering me about C-Ys. Does this make any intuitive type of sense or am I waaayyy out there in following this train of thought? Can any of it be expressed equationally to any degree of sensibility?

1. Question: Which amount of holes for Calabi-Yau?
Ponder: If 11 dimensions make String Theory whole (no pun), then why not consider 11 holes down to 8 holes (or visa-versa) existing in C-Y’s, due to 3 dimensions we observe and 3 particle families. (11 holes minus the 3 dimensions if necessary = the 8)
a) 8 to 11 holers, including time
b) Consider Time as “Passage” or “PG” for short (with TIME being considered as a possible determinate dealing with the other styles of C-Y’s with different numbers of holes)), any holes with no Passaging of vibratorily-made “particles” is a fake hole, a phantom hole (anti-hole?) with no time. (Can you tuck infinities in the fake holes where they would disappear and support supersymmetry further?) Passage (Time) therefore equals a +/- constant whether used or not.
(1) > 8 to 11 holers: = multiples of the 8-11 series with “left-over holes” being “no passage” timeless holes. (Do these No-PG holes cancel anything?)
(2) < 8 to 11 holers: make up The Bulk of the Standard Model or the Higgs Field
Therefore the question: (Q: Higgs Field = The Bulk? Q: Higgs Particle =? Q: How would this impact Standard Model joining with String Theory?)
(3) Admittedly “Left-field” Time Question: is Time itself then a result of a vibration which then in turn makes Passage for the other vibration(s)? Does that say dimensions themselves are in any way a result of strings or that Time is a non-particle characteristic of String vibration that allows Passage and thus the workings of particles?

2. Question: Then how many C-Y true shapes that count?
Ponder:
a) 8 to 11: then even if you -1 dimension of time, you still have 7 to 10 that can = another shape series = so therefore always no more than 4 shapes (8,9,10,and 11 holers or 7,8,9,10 holers if you minus Time dimension from the first 8-11 set)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
b) < 8 to 11: if you are dealing with 6 or less (thus here we are probably dealing with the 4 forces and their respective particles, including Higgs) then you have the Bulk of the Standard Model and that is a different shape-series. So, how many shapes count for the Bulk? 3,4,5,6 holers? So, is it possible that the Bulk could be related to any of the 8-11 holers in some way? (1) > 8 to 11 holers: = multiples of 8-11 series and Bulk related in any way? (2) < 8 to 11 holers: = make up The Bulk of the Standard Model
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 702 ·
24
Replies
702
Views
135K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
35K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K