How do I apply the Frobenius method to solve Hermite's ODE?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ognik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Frobenius method is applied to solve Hermite's ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by $y'' - 2xy' + 2\alpha y = 0$. The solution involves expressing $y$ as a power series and deriving the indicial equation, leading to $k(k-1) = 0$, which yields $k = 0$ or $k = 1$. A mistake was identified in the coefficient comparison, specifically in the second term, which should be $-2a_{j}(k+j)$ instead of $-2a_{j+1}(k+j+1)$. This correction is crucial for obtaining the correct recurrence relation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with the Frobenius method for series solutions
  • Knowledge of power series expansions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of series and coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Frobenius method in detail, focusing on its application to different types of ODEs
  • Explore Hermite polynomials and their properties in relation to Hermite's ODE
  • Learn about the convergence of power series solutions
  • Investigate other methods for solving linear differential equations, such as the method of undetermined coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are solving differential equations, particularly those interested in special functions and their applications in mathematical physics.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Hermite's ODE is $y'' - 2xy' + 2\alpha y = 0$

Let $y = \sum_{\lambda = 0}^{\infty} {a}_{\lambda} x^{k+\lambda}, y' = \sum a_{\lambda} (k+\lambda)x^{k+\lambda-1}, y'' = \sum a_\lambda (k+\lambda)(k+\lambda-1)x^{k+\lambda-2}$

I get the indicial eqtn of k(k-1) = 0, therefore k = 0 or 1. Lowest power of x again, let's me choose $a_1=0$

Then using a dummy variable j to make all powers of x equal, then equating coefficients, I get:

$ a_{j+2}(k+j+2)(k+j+1) -2a_{j+1}(k+j+1) + 2\alpha a_j = 0$

But the books answer shows me that they found the 2nd term to be $2a_{j}(k+j+1) $ - I can't find what I've done wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found my mistake, I forgot to multiply the 2nd term by x, so the correct eqtn is:

$ a_{j+2}(k+j+2)(k+j+1) -2a_{j}(k+j) + 2\alpha a_j = 0$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K