How do I calculate permutations of a multi-set with limited elements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crazorin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permutations
Click For Summary
To calculate permutations of a multi-set with limited elements, the approach involves using the formula for permutations of a multi-set, which accounts for repetitions. For example, with the set {1, 1, 1, 2, 3}, the task is to find how many different 4-digit numbers can be formed. The formula applied is based on the counts of each unique element, leading to a calculation of 5!/(2!3!) for the specific case. While there may not be a straightforward analytical formula for all variations, enumerating the possibilities algorithmically can yield the correct count. In this case, the total permutations amount to 21.
Crazorin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[mentor note: THis is not a homework assignment. It is for a work project.]

I need a formula that is probably based on permutations of multi-set. Except in my case you will not use up all elements of the sets, only some of them.

For example I have the following sets: {1,1,1}{2}{3};

Altogether 5 elements and I need to find out how many 3 digit numbers can be created. So I would use only 3 of the 5 elements.

Or the sets could be {1,1}{2,2,2}{3}; 6 elements to create 4 digit number.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are there multiple sets? Is the first set allowed elements for the first digit?

Can you give a more concrete example as sets like {1,1,1} is really the set {1}?
 
jedishrfu said:
Why are there multiple sets? Is the first set allowed elements for the first digit?

Can you give a more concrete example as sets like {1,1,1} is really the set {1}?

When I originally wrote up the problem, I didn't used sets.
I approached it as I have 6 numbers: 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3. How many different 4 digit number can be created of these 6 numbers?
Then someone said, what I need is the permutation of multi-set. In that case you handle each repetition as a set and than use the size of the sets in the formula.
Following this line you would get 3 sets with the size of 2, 3 and 1; and the permutation of the multi-set would be 5!/(2!3!1!)

So I thought after a learned that the permutation of multi-set seems to be the closest what I need out of the million different permutation/combination formulas, I decided to write up the problem with sets, instead of just a list of numbers.

I am not sure if the solution to my problem is a modification of the permutation of a multi-set, or I need a completely different approach.
 
This is indeed a multiset problem, but not a simple one. You want the number of permutations of 4 items from the multiset {1, 1, 1, 2, 3}. I am not sure there is an analytical formula for this but they are simple to enumerate algorithmically:
Code:
1    1    1
1    1    2
1    1    3
1    2    1
1    2    3
1    3    1
1    3    2
2    1    1
2    1    3
2    3    1
3    1    1
3    1    2
3    2    1
So the answer is 21.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K