How do I find the orthonormal basis for the intersection of subspaces U and V?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an orthonormal basis for the intersection of two subspaces, U and V, in a four-dimensional space. Participants are exploring the steps involved in determining the orthogonal basis and subsequently orthonormalizing it, while grappling with the nuances of their calculations and methodologies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants describe their attempts to find basic solutions for the subspaces U and V, using matrices and the Gram-Schmidt process. Questions arise regarding the correctness of their results and the steps taken, particularly in relation to orthonormalization and the handling of null spaces.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified potential missteps in their calculations, particularly in the final steps of orthonormalization. Others are exploring the implications of their findings and questioning the assumptions made about the relationships between the subspaces and their null spaces. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to find a space perpendicular to the union of the null spaces.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem involves a specific matrix setup and that the dimensions of the subspaces imply the existence of non-empty null spaces. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly combine and manipulate these vectors to arrive at the desired basis.

Intothephy7
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, i am trying to do the question on the image, Can some one help me out with the steps.

[PLAIN]http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/6818/algebra0.jpg

Solution in the image is right but my answer is so off from the current one.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is the steps i took

1. found basic solution for U, 3 by 4, matrix to find U-perp
1. found basic solution for V, 3 by 4, matrix to find V-perp
3. Then i put V and U - perpendicular vectors to gether and got basic solutions with dim = 2 and 2 basic solutions.

than i did gram schmitt to find othogonal basic of those two

F1 = X1
F2 = X2 - {(F1 dot X2) / ||F1||2}F1

where did i went wrong
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Found the answer, I actually have to find orthonormal vectors which is last step i missed

Q1 = (1/||F1||)F1
Q2 = (1/||F2||)F2
 
Old thread, I know, but same question.

I tried doing the things OP said he did but ended up with the wrong answer. Here's what I did.

First I took the vectors that spanned U and made them the rows of a 3x4 matrix A. Then I got the RREF form of this matrix and found the 4x1 matrix X where AX = 0. This matrix was in the form (transposed) t[-1.4 3 -2.4 1]. Just used random numbers for this example.

Then I did the same thing for the other vectors and also got another 4x1 matrix.

Then I used the Gram-Schmidt algorithm to find the orthogonal basis of those two column matrices which gave me two 4x1 matrices which I then orthonormalized (if that's the word haha).

Can someone please let me know where I went wrong? Thanks.
 
Mod Note: Moving this thread into the Calculus & Beyond section.
 
BluePhone said:
Old thread, I know, but same question.

I tried doing the things OP said he did but ended up with the wrong answer. Here's what I did.

First I took the vectors that spanned U and made them the rows of a 3x4 matrix A. Then I got the RREF form of this matrix and found the 4x1 matrix X where AX = 0. This matrix was in the form (transposed) t[-1.4 3 -2.4 1]. Just used random numbers for this example.

Instead of showing us random numbers, how about showing the actual result you got.



BluePhone said:
Then I did the same thing for the other vectors and also got another 4x1 matrix.

Same thing here; show your result.


BluePhone said:
Then I used the Gram-Schmidt algorithm to find the orthogonal basis of those two column matrices which gave me two 4x1 matrices which I then orthonormalized (if that's the word haha).

Can someone please let me know where I went wrong? Thanks.
 
The vectors I got were different but the question was the same; new numbers are generated every submission and I didn't write the matrix I got down, just scratchwork. But here's how I would solve the one in the original post:

First I'd rewrite the vectors as matrices:

2 0 -6 6
6 6 -2 -1
5 1 3 4

and

21 3 -9 30
6 2 18 -4
0 -2 3 -1

then I'd find the RREF of each

1 0 0 1.4674
0 1 0 -1.8043
0 0 1 -0.5109

and

1 0 0 1.2308
0 1 0 -0.3846
0 0 1 -0.5897

so I'd take the 4th variable as the parameter and make these two matrices which are the solutions to AX = 0

consider this X1

-1.4674
1.8043
0.5109
1

and

this X2

-1.2308
1.2308
0.5897
1

then I found F1 and F2

F1 = X1
F2 = X2 - {(F1 dot X2) / ||F1||^2}F1

and finally Q1 and Q2

Q1 = (1/||F1||)F1
Q2 = (1/||F2||)F2

for example, doing so would give me Q1

-0.56818
0.6986
...
...

which is incorrect
 
The subspace U is a subspace because 3 vectors of 4 elements each cannot fully span R(4); similarly for the subspace V. This implies that there is a non-empty null space associated with U and V. The vectors X1 and X2 you found each span the associated null space.

The intersection of U and V is the complement (perpendicular subspace) of the union of the two null spaces. What you found so far is a pair of vectors that span the union of the two null spaces.

You must find a space that is perpendicular to the union of the null spaces. What you need to do is combine X1 and X2 into a 4x2 matrix (working in integers):

Code:
[ -135/92  -16/13  ]
[  83/46      5/13   ]
[  47/92      23/39 ]
[     1         1    ]

transpose it and row reduce:

Code:
[ 1   0   -11/21  -6/7 ]
[ 0   1   -1/7     -1/7 ]

Kill the first two columns and make the 3rd and 4th variables parameters:

Code:
[ 11/21  6/7 ]
[  1/7    1/7 ]
[   1       0  ]
[   0       1  ]

There's your basis; just orthonormalize and you're done. You might even get the same answer as shown in the first post.
 
Excellent! Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K