How Do I Simplify the Right Side of the Mathematical Induction Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on simplifying the right side of the mathematical induction equation for the sum of an arithmetic series, specifically the equation $$\sum_{k=1}^n(k+4)=\frac{n(n+9)}{2}$$. Users detail the steps to prove this equation by induction, emphasizing the importance of finding a common denominator when adding terms. The simplification process leads to the expression $$\frac{k^2+11k+10}{2}$$, which is derived from combining $$\frac{1}{2}k(k+9)$$ and $$[(k+1)+4]$$. The discussion highlights common pitfalls in understanding the induction process and the arithmetic series formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with arithmetic series and their summation formulas
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation, including finding common denominators
  • Basic proficiency in polynomial factoring
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in detail
  • Learn about the properties and formulas of arithmetic series
  • Practice algebraic manipulation techniques, focusing on combining fractions
  • Explore polynomial factoring methods to enhance simplification skills
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and proof techniques, educators teaching mathematical induction, and anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of series and summation in mathematics.

Hazel
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Original Equation: 5+6+7+...+(n+4)=1/2n(n+9)

Ok, I've tried everything to understand this. I'm just not getting it. I understand everything (n=1, k+1, etc) up until this point: "To continue with proof what must be done?". I know you must simplify the right side, but I don't understand how they simplified it to this:
I'm going to start at the adding k+1 to both sides of equation part.
5+6+7+...+(k+4)+[(k+1)+4]=1/2k(k+9)[(k+1)+4]

Now it says to simplify the right side:
1/2k(k+9)+[(k+1)+4]

It says after simplifying it would be:
1/2(k^2+11k+10).

HOW? I don't get it. Please help me. I bet it's going to be so simple, but I can't find out how.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm going to start at the beginning...we are given to prove by induction the following:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n(k+4)=\frac{n(n+9)}{2}$$

First, we check the base case $P_1$:

$$1+4=\frac{1(1+9)}{2}$$

$$5=\frac{10}{2}=5$$

True, so we state the induction hypothesis $P_n$:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n(k+4)=\frac{n(n+9)}{2}$$

As our induction step, we may add $((n+1)+4)=n+5$ to both sides:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n(k+4)+((n+1)+4)=\frac{n(n+9)}{2}+n+5$$

On the left, incorporate the new term into the sum while on the right get a common denominator:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}(k+4)=\frac{n(n+9)+2(n+5)}{2}$$

On the right, distribute:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}(k+4)=\frac{n^2+9n+2n+10}{2}$$

Combine like terms:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}(k+4)=\frac{n^2+11n+10}{2}$$

Factor:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}(k+4)=\frac{(n+1)((n+1)+9)}{2}$$

We have now derived $P_{n+1}$ from $P_n$ thereby completing the proof by induction.
 
Ok I see you added n+5 to both sides. I'm going to try this on my exercise to see if I can get it now. Thanks!

- - - Updated - - -

I still do not see have they got 1/2k(k+9)+[k+1)+4] simplified to:
1/2(K^2+11k+10)
 
Hazel said:
Ok I see you added n+5 to both sides. I'm going to try this on my exercise to see if I can get it now. Thanks!

- - - Updated - - -

I still do not see have they got 1/2k(k+9)+[k+1)+4] simplified to:
1/2(K^2+11k+10)

Okay we begin with:

$$\frac{1}{2}k(k+9)+[(k+1)+4]$$

Let's simplify the second term:

$$\frac{1}{2}k(k+9)+(k+5)$$

Now, in order to add these terms, we need a common denominator:

$$\frac{1}{2}k(k+9)+\frac{1}{2}2(k+5)$$

Now both terms have a denominator of 2, so let's put both numerators all over 2:

$$\frac{k(k+9)+2(k+5)}{2}$$

Now, distribute in both terms in the numerator:

$$\frac{k^2+9k+2k+10}{2}$$

Combine like terms:

$$\frac{k^2+11k+10}{2}$$

See it? :D
 
Oh thank you so much Mark! I have been on this problem for HOURS! The example never told me I needed a common denominator. You couldn't have explained it better! Thanks so much!
 
Hazel said:
Oh thank you so much Mark! I have been on this problem for HOURS! The example never told me I needed a common denominator. You couldn't have explained it better! Thanks so much!

Glad to have helped! :D

Just remember, whenever you add two terms, you have to have a common denominator..this rule shall follow you the rest of your days in mathematics. :D
 
Got it! Thanks. :D
 
Hazel said:
Original Equation: 5+6+7+...+(n+4)=1/2n(n+9)

Ok, I've tried everything to understand this. I'm just not getting it. I understand everything (n=1, k+1, etc) up until this point: "To continue with proof what must be done?". I know you must simplify the right side, but I don't understand how they simplified it to this:
I'm going to start at the adding k+1 to both sides of equation part.
5+6+7+...+(k+4)+[(k+1)+4]=1/2k(k+9)[(k+1)+4]

Now it says to simplify the right side:
1/2k(k+9)+[(k+1)+4]

It says after simplifying it would be:
1/2(k^2+11k+10).

HOW? I don't get it. Please help me. I bet it's going to be so simple, but I can't find out how.

There's no need to have to resort to induction. Your LHS is an arithmetic series with $\displaystyle \begin{align*} a = t_1 = 5 \end{align*}$, last term $\displaystyle \begin{align*} l = t_n = n + 4 \end{align*}$ and common difference $\displaystyle \begin{align*} d = 1 \end{align*}$ so the sum is

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} S_n &= \frac{n}{2} \left( a + l \right) \\ &= \frac{n}{2} \left[ 5 + \left( n + 4 \right) \right] \\ &= \frac{n}{2} \left( n + 9 \right) \end{align*}$
 
MarkFL said:
First, we check the base case $P_1$:
...
True, so we state the induction hypothesis $P_n$:
I don't think it is good to use the notation $P_1$ before defining $P_n$. After all, $P_1$ is just an instance of $P_n$ where $n$ is instantiated to 1. The first step of every induction proof should be writing $P_n$ in its general form. This allows correctly stating the induction hypothesis and what needs to be proved in the induction step. Moreover, in some proofs by induction figuring out $P_n$ is the most complicated part.
 
  • #10
Evgeny.Makarov said:
I don't think it is good to use the notation $P_1$ before defining $P_n$. After all, $P_1$ is just an instance of $P_n$ where $n$ is instantiated to 1. The first step of every induction proof should be writing $P_n$ in its general form. This allows correctly stating the induction hypothesis and what needs to be proved in the induction step. Moreover, in some proofs by induction figuring out $P_n$ is the most complicated part.

In this case, $P_n$ is given up front, it is what is to be proved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K