How do I solve this equation for x - finding the maximum domains?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter itzela
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    domains Maximum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation 3(2^(2x+1)+5(2^(-x))= 31 for x, with a focus on finding the maximum domains of the expression involved. Participants explore various methods for approaching the problem, including the use of logarithms and substitutions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests taking logarithms to solve for x, but others argue that this approach is not logical due to the nature of the equation involving addition.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of identifying the domain of the expression rather than focusing solely on solving for x.
  • A different perspective is offered by suggesting a substitution, letting t=2^x, to transform the equation into a polynomial form for easier solving.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of the original question, with one participant questioning the use of the term "maximum domains" in relation to the equation.
  • One participant expresses confusion about their previous attempts with logarithms, indicating they arrived at an incorrect solution and seeking alternative methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to solve the equation or the meaning of "maximum domains." There are multiple competing views on how to proceed with the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the definitions and assumptions related to the terms used in the discussion, particularly the concept of "maximum domains" as it pertains to the equation.

itzela
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I have a problem solving this equation for x - finding the maximum domains.

3(2^(2x+1)+5(2^(-x) )= 31

What I did first was to take the logarithim on both sides of the equation... to solve for x. But that apparently isn't a "logical" way to proceed. Any advice?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
taking logs won't help. logs don't work well when you're adding things. why take logs anyway? you just want the set of x for which that expression makes sense for whatever rules you have to satsify. For quesitons like this it is 'avoid square roots of -ve numbers, and don't divide by zero'.
 
Ey Dude , I think u didnt get the function fully,it is
[3(2^(2x+1))]+[5(2^(-x)] = 31

^ means to the power of ...
 
I would appreciate any help i could get from anyone that has any idea at all to solve this equation because i have a upcoming exam tomorrow with the similar question like this and i really need help..please i would appreciate all kinds of help that i could get..i just can solve this equation as i have no idea whether to input it with log or should i input it with a different way...any suggestions also would be gladly welcomed...is there another way i could approach this equation as i have tried it with log and it didn't come out so well..so please..any approach??and for assurance that i am not here just that everyone to help me do my homework without me solving i found out with logs that the answer was x=-1.336 which is i wrong i think..please :P
 
You asked to find the domain of something. I presumed that to be the LHS of the equation. So are you really asking 'how do I solve this for x?' i.e. nothing to do with domains?
 
Set t=2^x and express your equation in t. Rearrange it a little and you'll get a polynomial. Solve. Then substitute x back and solve for it.
 
You can't expect people to guess what you want! You titled this "Domains" and your question was "finding the maximum domains". The you show us an equation. That makes no sense at all. There is no such thing as a "domain" for an equation. A function has a domain. And a function has a domain. I don't know what you mean "the maximum domains".

But then you start asking about solving for x- which has nothing to do with finding a domain. If that really is the problem, dp what Eighty suggested: let t= ex and first solve for t.

Hint: e-x= 1/ex= 1/t and e2x+1= e2xe1= e(ex)2= et2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K