How Do Insects Fly Despite Aerodynamic Challenges?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the mechanisms of insect flight, particularly addressing the challenges posed by traditional aerodynamic theories. Participants explore the biological, aerodynamic, and evolutionary aspects of how insects, like bumblebees, manage to fly despite these challenges. The conversation references a podcast featuring insights from an expert in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a podcast that discusses the complexities of insect flight, suggesting that traditional aerodynamic models may not fully explain the phenomenon.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the notion that bumblebees should not be able to fly, arguing that this perspective may stem from a lack of serious investigation or insufficient technological development in flow visualization and computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
  • Another participant introduces the concept of anomalies in scientific paradigms, suggesting that the challenges in understanding insect flight could represent an anomaly that may lead to either a resolution within existing frameworks or a paradigm shift in the field.
  • There is mention of unique wing movements in insects, such as twisting and the generation of lift through vortices, which may differ from traditional aerodynamic principles.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of these findings and invite further commentary from those more knowledgeable about the podcast's content.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the traditional aerodynamic challenges posed by insect flight. Multiple competing views are presented, with some participants defending the traditional perspective while others suggest alternative explanations and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions underlying traditional aerodynamic theories and the definitions of anomalies in scientific paradigms. The relationship between the unique wing movements of insects and established aerodynamic principles remains unresolved.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,749
Reaction score
12,019
I am putting this in General Discussion because it could go into either biology or aerodynamics.

Remember how bumble bees were not supposed to be able to fly aerodynamically?
This explains why that is wrong.

Here is a podcast I just found (came out in 2019).
The two podcast guys interview Michael Dickinson (Caltech) who does a great job of describing the biology, aerodynamics, evolution, and neurobiology that are involved with insect flight.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and pinball1970
Biology news on Phys.org
Just to give you a free bump...

I really never liked this meme. I strongly dislike arguments against reality, and this was always framed that way. And even though I never looked deeply into it, I have a hard time believing it was actually that big of a problem. More likely, nobody ever put enough serious effort into it, or at worst mini-scopic flow visualization and CFD hadn't been well enough developed to show it. But fundamentally and at face value, it would seem like all wing-flapping beings probably fly pretty much the same way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
Thanks for the bump @russ_watters!

I am not sure how to interpret your response.

Here are some comments:
russ_watters said:
I really never liked this meme. I strongly dislike arguments against reality, and this was always framed that way. And even though I never looked deeply into it, I have a hard time believing it was actually that big of a problem.
I wouldn't call it a meme, but maybe it is. Nevertheless, it conforms pretty well to what Kuhn would have called an anomaly during periods of normal (as opposed to a period of revolution), in his paradigm view of the world.
Kuhn (1970) defines an anomaly as a violation of the "paradigm-induced expectations that govern normal science" (pp. 52-53). Anomalies are detected through empirical analyses and have formed the basis for most discoveries in the natural sciences. For Kuhn, the discovery of anomalies provides the impetus for paradigm change within a field of study. Anomalies are empirical difficulties that reflect differences between the observed and theoretically expected data.
An anomaly amounts to be an outstanding problem in the field (of accounting for flight of certain insects with normal aerodynamic methods). An anomaly could resolve into either figuring it out with fairly normal concepts or to having a scientific revolution leading to a new view of these issues. Not sure which way this finding will push it, but it still seems pretty normal (science-wise) to me.

russ_watters said:
mini-scopic flow visualization and CFD hadn't been well enough developed to show it.
This makes complete sense to me, however, ...

My understanding what was described in the podcast was not just the same old thing as traditional aerodynamics and airfoils. However, I maybe wrong about this so maybe someone more knowledgeable then me could comment on the podcast's contents.
The unique finding seems to me to be that the wings go back at forth while twisting between the direction changes, and develop lift to a large extent due to vortices that shift back and forth between the front and back of the wing when it changes directions. (maybe humming birds do this too, not sure.)
Not sure how this relates exactly to your comment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
76
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K