How Do Shock Functions Aid in Solving Differential Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
U(t)=1
[tex] Vs(t)=V_0 U(t)[/tex]
[tex] (Vc)' + \frac{1}{RC}Vc=\frac{1}{RC}Vc=\frac{1}{RC}V_0[/tex]
[tex] (Vc)' + \frac{1}{RC}Vc(t)=\frac{1}{RC}V_0[/tex]
given:
[tex] Vc(0^+)=0[/tex]
from her i can't under anything regarding the term of use:
"
homogeneous solution is:
[tex] (V_ch)'+\frac{1}{RC}Vch=0[/tex]
we guess a solution from the form of
[tex] V_ch=Ae^{st}[/tex]
and substitute into the homogeneous equation:
[tex] \int Ae^{st} +\frac{1}{rc}Ae^{st}=0[/tex]
"

these are only the first two steps but i can't understand why are they doing that
the youtube solution differs a lot

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
transgalactic said:
U(t)=1
[tex] Vs(t)=V_0 U(t)[/tex]
[tex] (Vc)' + \frac{1}{RC}Vc=\frac{1}{RC}Vc=\frac{1}{RC}V_0[/tex]
I don't understand this. Did you mean to have those two "=" or is this a typo?

[tex] (Vc)' + \frac{1}{RC}Vc(t)=\frac{1}{RC}V_0[/tex]
Okay, is this what you meant above?

given:
[tex] Vc(0^+)=0[/tex]
from her i can't under anything regarding the term of use:
"
homogeneous solution is:
[tex] (V_ch)'+\frac{1}{RC}Vch=0[/tex]
Well, that's the "associated homogeneous equation", not yet a "solution".
You can rewrite it as [itex]dV_{ch}/V_{ch}= (-1/RC)dt[/itex] and integrate that.
[itex]ln(V_{ch})= -t/RC+ K[/itex] and taking exponentials of both sides, [itex]V_{ch}= K_1e^{t/RC}[/itex] where [itex]K_1= e^K[/itex].

we guess a solution from the form of
[tex] V_ch=Ae^{st}[/tex]
and substitute into the homogeneous equation:
[tex] \int Ae^{st} +\frac{1}{rc}Ae^{st}=0[/tex]
Why an integral? [itex]V_{ch}'[/itex] is the derivative
[tex](Ae^{st})'+ \frac{1}{rc}Ae^{st}= sAe^{st}+ \frac{1}{rc}Ae^{st}= 0[/tex]
so the exponentials cancel leaving s+ 1/rc= 0. s= -1/rc and the solution becomes [itex]Ae^{t/rc} just as before. That method is more often used with higher order differential equations where you cannot integrate as I did above.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> these are only the first two steps but i can't understand why are they doing that<br /> the youtube solution differs a lot<br /> <br /> ?? </div> </div> </blockquote> You can justify that method by arguing that for y(x) something like Ay"+ By'+ Cy= 0, a "linear equation with constant coefficients", in order that y and its derivatives cancel, to give 0, y' and y" must be the same "kind" of function as y. Exponentials do that nicely: the derivative of [itex]e^{ax}[/itex] is [itex]ae^{ax}[/itex], the same exponential multiplied by a.<br /> <br /> But you should be aware this is not based on any idea that a solution MUST be an exponential! For example, The equation y"= 0 has general solution y= Ax+ B and y"+ y= 0 has general solution y= A cos x+ B sin x. Since those solutions are indirectly related to exponentials, "trying" [itex]e^{sx}[/itex] can still lead you to them.[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
U(t) is called the shock function
it equals 1 in this case
Vs=vo*U(t) (Vs the voltage of the source)

does this help ??