How do we represent a triangle wave for input voltage in this circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diode circuit
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Assuming the diode can be modeled as an ideal diode, and ##R_1=R_2##, plot the waveform ##v_0(t)## for the circuit below assuming a triangle wave input.
Relevant Equations
Write an expression for ##v_0(t)## in terms of ##v_i, R_1##, and ##R_2##.
This problem is from Agarwal's Foundations of Analog and Digital Circuits.

Here is the circuit.
1724224917611.png


Here is my own picture of the circuit with circuit variables

1724224998144.png


If ##v_0<0## then we replace the diode with a short circuit and

$$v_i=i_1R_1$$

$$i_3=-i_1$$

$$v_0=0$$

If ##v_0\geq 0## then we replace the diode with an open circuit and

$$v_i=i_1R_1+i_1R_2=2Ri_1$$

$$i_1=i_2$$

$$v_0=i_1R_2=v_i\frac{R_2}{R_1}$$

At this point we would sub in an expression representing the triangle wave that is ##v_i##.

I'm not sure exactly how this would be in this context. I have used a periodic triangle wave function defined as ##f(t)=|t|## on ##t\in [-\pi, \pi)## which I then expressed as a Fourier series.

For the purposes of this problem, how would I represent the triangle wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right, I missed a factor of 2 in the denominator of the expression for ##v_0##. Here is the correction

$$v_0=i_1R_2=v_i\frac{R}{2R}=\frac{v_i}{2}$$

##f(t)=|t|## is indeed always positive but making this symmetric about the ##x##-axis is just a question of offsetting by a constant, right?

In any case, it does not seem that the assumption about what exactly the functional form of the input voltage ##v_i## is is relevant to this problem.

We could sub in many different functional forms. It's just a substitution. Or maybe I am missing something?