How do you calculate the Kuhn length of a polymer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Polymer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the calculation of the Kuhn length of a polymer, exploring theoretical models and mathematical formulations related to polymer chain configurations. Participants examine the implications of freely jointed rods versus more complex interactions between segments, and the discussion includes both derivations and interpretations of relevant equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a first approximation of a polymer chain as consisting of freely jointed rods and derives an expression for the mean squared end-to-end distance.
  • Another participant suggests a geometric interpretation of the relationship involving the cosine of angles between segments and hints at the need for a stochastic argument to validate the more accurate formula.
  • A third participant proposes a method to calculate the mean cosine of angles between steps in the polymer chain, leading to a refined expression for the mean squared end-to-end distance.
  • Several participants inquire about the relevance of their backgrounds in materials science and chemistry to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on the derivation of the more accurate formula or the assumptions involved. Multiple competing views remain regarding the mathematical treatment of the polymer model.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential need for stochastic arguments and the implications of assumptions such as the mean angle between segments, which may affect the derivation of results.

etotheipi
My lecturer said that as a first approximation, we can take the polymer chain to consist of ##n## freely jointed rods of length ##l##. That's just going to give$$\langle \vec{R}_n^2 \rangle = \langle \sum_{i=1}^n \vec{r}_i \cdot \sum_{j=1}^n \vec{r}_j \rangle = \langle \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \vec{r}_i \cdot \vec{r}_j \rangle = l^2 \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \langle \cos{\theta_{ij}}\rangle$$The freely jointed condition gives ##\langle \cos{\theta}_{ij} \rangle = \delta_{ij}##, so the ##\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \langle \cos{\theta_{ij}}\rangle = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \delta_{ii} = n## and thus ##\sqrt{\langle \vec{R}_n^2 \rangle} = l\sqrt{n}##. A more accurate equation, where the rods are no longer freely jointed, is actually $$\sqrt{\langle \vec{R}_n^2 \rangle}= l\sqrt{n}\sqrt{\frac{1+\cos{\theta}}{1-\cos{\theta}}} $$I looked around but couldn't find a derivation of this, so I wondered if someone could give me a hint as to proceed with the ##\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \langle \cos{\theta_{ij}}\rangle## term in order to obtain the more accurate result? Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I think it is easier to see geometrical situation, if you write ##\sqrt{\dfrac{1+cos \theta}{1-\cos \theta}}=\left|\cot \left(\dfrac{\theta}{2}\right)\right|##.

The closest I came was: "It can be shown..." (sic!) "... that ##E(\cos \theta)=e^{-l/l_p}##, where ##l_p## is the persistence length, defined as ...".

In any case, it will need a stochastic argument, why the formula "... where the rods are no longer freely jointed, is actually ..." holds. Wiki unfortunately says "clarification needed". It feels like "assume friction". As far as I could see, the deduction uses the law of large numbers. Maybe you get to the desired result if you use the central limit theorem instead. Or you understand this on page 21 (29):
https://www.fz-juelich.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/IBI/IBI-4/EN/polymerKhkolov_pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
and again without details on page 10 (25):
https://www.theorie.physik.uni-muen...06/softmatter/talks/Peter_Jensen-Polymers.pdf
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Awesome, that's exactly it! Assume that bonds between adjacent steps have mean ##\langle \theta \rangle = \gamma##, and thus ##\langle \cos{\theta} \rangle## for steps separated by ##j-i## is ##(\cos{\gamma)}^{j-i}##, so$$\begin{align*}

\langle \vec{R}_n^2 \rangle = l^2 \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \langle \cos{\theta_{ij}}\rangle &= l^2 \left (\sum_{i=j} \langle \cos{\theta_{ij}} \rangle + 2\sum_{i < j} \langle \cos{\theta_{ij}} \rangle \right) \\

&= l^2(n + 2\sum_{i < j}(\cos{\gamma})^{j-i}) = nl^2 \left(1+ 2\frac{\cos{\gamma}}{1-\cos{\gamma}} \right)

\end{align*}$$and simplify for the result. Thanks!
 
Are you doing materials science?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Mayhem said:
Are you doing materials science?

Yes! Are you?
 
etotheipi said:
Yes! Are you?
No, just chemistry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K