How Do You Find a Plane Orthogonal to a Given Line?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Whatupdoc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonal Plane
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the equation of a plane through the point (-1, -2, -3) that is orthogonal to the line defined by the parametric equations x=5+2t, y=-3-5t, z=2-2t, with a coefficient of x equal to 2. Participants emphasize using the cross product of vectors to establish orthogonality, specifically utilizing vectors a = <-1, -2, -3> and b = <2, -5, 2>. The method involves determining a vector parallel to the line and applying the dot product to derive the plane's equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, specifically cross product and dot product.
  • Familiarity with parametric equations of lines in three-dimensional space.
  • Knowledge of the geometric interpretation of planes and lines in 3D.
  • Basic skills in algebra and solving equations involving multiple variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the cross product to understand how it defines orthogonality.
  • Learn how to derive equations of planes from points and normal vectors.
  • Practice solving problems involving parametric equations of lines in 3D.
  • Explore examples of finding planes orthogonal to given lines in various contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in geometry, particularly those studying vector calculus, as well as anyone seeking to understand the relationship between lines and planes in three-dimensional space.

Whatupdoc
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Find an equation of a plane through the point (-1, -2, -3) which is orthogonal to the line x=5+2t,y=-3-5t,z=2-2t
in which the coefficient of x is 2.

______________________________=0

i don't get this problem at all, but here's what i came up with after sitting here at the computer for a long time attempting to do this problem.

okay i know that by theorem, The vector a X b is orthogonal to both a and b.

a = <-1,-2,-3>
b= <2,-5,2>

that's all i came up, i attempted many different ways, but it doesn't make sense at all, can someone lend me a hand?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, here's a plan: Find out the general form of a vector parallel to the line. (it will be a function of two parameters; say you labeled them t_1 and t_2.)Write out the form of a vector that lies in the plane (it will be a function of x,y & z). Then take the dot product of those two vectors and set it equal to 0. This is the equation of your plane. Now chose a particular vector parrarel to the line such that the coeff. of x is 2... that is to say, set t_1 and t_2 such that the coeff. of x is 2.

I understand that this might sound very confusing but try your best to progress. If you get stuck, or if after thinking very hard about it, you still can't find a way, I'll help you some more. Good luck!
 
N*r = n*r_0 is the equation I am looking for right?

i am totally lost here, book doesn't help much either, can you help me start it.
 
What are N,r,n and r_0 ?!

Have you done more simple similar problems before? If you're new to this kind of problem then this one is a rought introduction IMO!

Let's start with the first step of my plan. Let's find the general form of a vector parallel to the line. The equation of the line is written in parametric form. It means that for any value of t, the point (x,y,z)=(5+2t,-3-5t,-2-2t) is on the line. Ok, so let's find two points on the line by setting t = t_1 and t = t_2. Our two points are \vec{P}_1 = (5+2t_1,-3-5t_1,-2-2t_1) and \vec{P}_2 = (5+2t_2,-3-5t_2,-2-2t_2). By means of a simple drawing, you can convince yourself that \vec{P}_1 - \vec{P}_2 = (2(t_1-t_2), -5(t_1-t_2), -2(t_1-t_2)) is a vector parallel to the line (it is in fact IN/MERGED WITH the line).

Now, make sure you understand every step in this paragraph and do step 2 on your own. Supposing (x,y,z) is a point in the plan, use the same method as above (substraction) to find a vector that is parallel to the plan.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
738
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K