How do you get the color singlet combination of quarks?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formation of color singlet states for quarks, specifically in the context of the Δ++ particle. It highlights that the total wave function must be anti-symmetric due to the identical nature of the three quarks, leading to the requirement that their colors must differ. The unnormalized anti-symmetric color singlet state is expressed as rbg - rgb + grb - gbr + bgr - brg. This formulation is derived from the representation theory of SU(3), where the invariant tensor ε_{ijk} is used to contract the quark states, resulting in the expression Δ^{++} = ε_{ijk} q^{i} q^{j} q^{k}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Familiarity with SU(3) symmetry and representation theory
  • Knowledge of color charge in quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Basic concepts of tensor algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the representation theory of SU(3) in detail
  • Learn about the role of color charge in quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Explore the implications of anti-symmetry in multi-particle quantum systems
  • Investigate the construction of singlet states using invariant tensors
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in quantum chromodynamics and the properties of baryons.

shinwolf14
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I was reading my book and it states that the lack of anti-symmetry in the total wave function of the Δ++ particle led to the introduction of the missing degree of freedom, or color. It states that free particles are colorless so they must be in color singlet states. From there, it just lists the unnormalized anti-symmetric color singlet state as

rbg-rgb+grb-gbr+bgr-brg

I don't understand how they jumped from that statement to the equation. Where does this come from? Does it have to do with SU(3) symmetry? Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a very simple idea: the ##\Delta^{++}## is made by three identical particle with all the same quantum numbers except for color. Since they are all identical fermions and none of the possible 3 pairs can be in the exact same state this means that the color of each of them must be different from that of the others (i.e. rbg). However, you also know that the total colo wave function must be anti-symmetric and so you need to anti-symmetrize the rbg state with respect to all possible exchange of two particles. This gives the color wave function that you wrote.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
It's of course also derivable from group theory, although it's not necessary here because of Einj 's explanation.

The representation theory of SU(3), however tells you how to build singlets in terms of its various representations. For quarks the color group is realized in the socalled fundamental representiation, i.e., in the vector space ##\mathbb{C}^3##. There are two non-equivalent three-dimensional representations of SU(3), which is given by the fundamental and the conjugate complex representation (in the more familiar case of SU(2) these two representations are equivalent).

If you have only quarks, i.e., only the fundamental representation, SU(3) representation theory tells you that you need three quarks, and the only way to build a color singlet is to use the totally antisymmetric product state for the color-degree of freedom. The final result, explained by Einj is thus unique.
 
shinwolf14 said:
I was reading my book and it states that the lack of anti-symmetry in the total wave function of the Δ++ particle led to the introduction of the missing degree of freedom, or color. It states that free particles are colorless so they must be in color singlet states. From there, it just lists the unnormalized anti-symmetric color singlet state as

rbg-rgb+grb-gbr+bgr-brg

I don't understand how they jumped from that statement to the equation. Where does this come from? Does it have to do with SU(3) symmetry? Any help would be greatly appreciated
In any group, a singlet is obtained by contracting (relevant) tensors with the appropriate invariant tensor of the group. So, for SU_{c}(3) the invariant tensor is \epsilon_{i j k} and the 3-quark tensor in the question is T^{i j k} = q^{i} q^{j} q^{k}, where q^{1} = r , \ \ q^{2} = b , \ \ q^{3} = g. Therefore \Delta^{+ +} = \epsilon_{i j k} q^{i} q^{j} q^{k} .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
9K