How do you integrate eqns with indices?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on integrating the equation ## \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial A^\mu \,\partial A^\nu} = 0 ##, leading to the solution ## \frac{\partial f}{\partial A^\mu} = C_1(A^{\rho\neq\mu}) + (1-\delta_{\mu\nu})\,C_2(A^{\rho\neq\nu}) ##. The constants ##C_1## and ##C_2## are determined by initial or boundary conditions. The conversation highlights the confusion regarding the interpretation of the partial derivative as a covariant tensor and compares it to functions of two variables, emphasizing the importance of index notation in tensor calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus and covariant derivatives
  • Familiarity with partial differential equations
  • Knowledge of boundary and initial conditions in mathematical physics
  • Basic concepts of multivariable functions and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of covariant tensors in differential geometry
  • Learn about the implications of boundary conditions in partial differential equations
  • Explore the integration of multivariable functions in calculus
  • Investigate the role of index notation in tensor analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or differential geometry, particularly those interested in tensor analysis and its applications in physics.

JuanC97
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hello, I just want to clarify some things with a simple exercise: I have the equation ## \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial A^\mu \,\partial A^\nu} = 0## and I want to integrate it once assuming that ## f=f(A^1,A^2,...,A^n)=f(A^\rho) ##.

I think the solution should be ## \frac{\partial f}{\partial A^\mu} = C_1(A^{\rho\neq\mu}) + (1-\delta_{\mu\nu})\,C_2(A^{\rho\neq\nu}) ##
where ##C_1## and ##C_2## are functions that have to be determined by initial/boundary conditions, the first term came from the integral wrt ##A^\nu## when ##\mu=\nu## and the second one when ##\mu\neq\nu##.

The big confusion arises when I think...
1. Does this really make any sense? - It just looks weird.
2. If ## \frac{\partial f}{\partial A^\mu} ## were a covariant tensor, it would make a lot more sense if I had written ## h(A_\mu) ## instead of ## h(A^\mu) ##, wouldn't it?.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Compare to e.g. functions of two variables f(x,y). If one has

## \frac{\partial f}{ \partial x} = 0 ##

then the solution is given by

##f(x,y) = f(y)##. I.e. the usual integration constant is promoted to an "integration function of y". So I'd say that if in your case

##\frac{\partial g}{ \partial A^{\nu}} = 0##

we get that the solution is a vector field with lower index which can be any function of all the other fields you have; different fields are indepent per definition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
974
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K