How do you interpret raw data?

Mode of Inference

  • Ætiologic - isolates mechanisms for direct causation

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bayesian - tends to include extraneous a priori considerations

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pyrrhonian - will doubt anything, even skepticism itself

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Solipsist - ascribes perceptual qualia exclusively to the mind

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
  • #1
Specifically, how do you come to believe what you do? Common methods of justifying novel premises epistemologically tend to favor one of two ideologies:

  • Stochastic - likes to interpret according to high recurrence and correlativity
  • Fatalist - believes that future/past can be deduced from knowledge of present circumstances

These are the two ideological premises from which the six poll methods can be derived: Ætiologic, Nomothetic, and Solipsist arguments can be seen primarily as assertions of determinism, whereas Bayesian, Frequentist, and Pyrrhonian frames of reference always adhere to a statistical approach. There is also another undercurrent running in this poll: Frequentist and Ætiologic justifications tend to employ an exclusively empirical underpinning; Nomothetic and Bayesian inferences depend heavily on a priori convictions (Solipsism is also usually defended using the a priori because a posteriori attempts at verification are not widely credited; Pyrrhonism may seem like an analytic proposition at first but it actually only indoctrinates an inductive negation of premises, including the self-negation of any premise that might eventually support a rationalist Pyrrhonian criterion, and so is actually an [anti-] empirical enterprise - I have taken great pains to clarify this in the past; you can hear my detailed arguments http://youtube.com/watch?v=mdEreZjrNeM").
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Pythagorean
Gold Member
4,214
272
I don't really justify much, I have a healthy mix of comfort and obligation in my work (i.e. I do what I want and what it takes to get by):

Ætiologic - isolates mechanisms for direct causation
Bayesian - tends to include extraneous a priori considerations
Frequentist - respects only empirical evidence and probability
Nomothetic - uses an intuitive system of diagnostic references
Pyrrhonian - will doubt anything, even skepticism itself
Solipsist - ascribes perceptual qualia exclusively to the mind

Ætiologic - don't use, I think it's politicians?
Bayesian - politicians...?

Frequentist - me at work and school and sometimes during introspection (your memory is a terrible sample space though, methinx, but maybe there's a reason some events stick out more than others, we call it 'weighting' in statistics, *chuckle*).

Nomothetic - I practice this a lot, sometimes even at work, but I never rely solely on it, and investigate as a Frequentist before.

Pyrrhonian - I go here sometimes.

Solipsist - it's an interesting point that has it's merits and I often consider it in a philosophical atmosphere, but I'm not a 'brain in a vat'.
 
  • #3
664
3
Bayesian / Frequentist
 
  • #4
I don't really justify much, I have a healthy mix of comfort and obligation in my work (i.e. I do what I want and what it takes to get by):

Ætiologic - don't use, I think it's politicians?
Bayesian - politicians...?

Frequentist - me at work and school and sometimes during introspection (your memory is a terrible sample space though, methinx, but maybe there's a reason some events stick out more than others, we call it 'weighting' in statistics, *chuckle*).

Nomothetic - I practice this a lot, sometimes even at work, but I never rely solely on it, and investigate as a Frequentist before.

Pyrrhonian - I go here sometimes.

Solipsist - it's an interesting point that has it's merits and I often consider it in a philosophical atmosphere, but I'm not a 'brain in a vat'.

I agree with your description of solipsism, but I am not sure what you mean by 'politicians' and I think that the activation of memory has a lot to do with long-term potentiation and parallel connectivity in the hippocampus and cortex. However, if you primarily consider yourself to be a Frequentist, please remember to vote for it in the poll.

Bayesian / Frequentist

Bayesian is a statistical form of rationalism and Frequentist is a statistical form of empiricism. Do you tend to prefer to theorize in your mind (Bayesian) or would you rather experiment in the real world (Frequentist)? Don't forget to vote!
 
  • #5
1,250
2
I voted nomothetic because I am always thinking like a physicist, I dislike frequentist and Ætiologic deduction (although it reminds me of engineering), I doubt the validity of bayesianism applied to reality, and I favor Wittgenstein's rejection of Pyrrhonism and Solipsism.
 
  • #6
664
3
Bayesian is a statistical form of rationalism and Frequentist is a statistical form of empiricism. Do you tend to prefer to theorize in your mind (Bayesian) or would you rather experiment in the real world (Frequentist)? Don't forget to vote!

I don't think they are mutually exclusive.
 
  • #8
Pythagorean
Gold Member
4,214
272
I agree with your description of solipsism, but I am not sure what you mean by 'politicians' and I think that the activation of memory has a lot to do with long-term potentiation and parallel connectivity in the hippocampus and cortex. However, if you primarily consider yourself to be a Frequentist, please remember to vote for it in the poll.

Yeah, my answers were a bit terse and I see a grammar error even. I meant that these seem like methods meant for making big conclusions that are inevitably at the mercy of politics.

Here's your definitions:

Ætiologic - isolates mechanisms for direct causation
Bayesian - tends to include extraneous a priori considerations

I might have a misunderstanding about Baeyesian, but showing causation is often associated with political motivation in my mind; extraneous a priori considerations reminds me of a large set of data that you've made assumptions about in order to arrive at your conclusion about causation.
 

Related Threads on How do you interpret raw data?

Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
6
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
3
Replies
66
Views
9K
Replies
64
Views
13K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
686
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
11K
Top