How do you map the graph of y=6^x onto the graph of y=6^(3x)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on mapping the graph of y=6^x onto y=6^(3x) through a geometrical transformation. The transformation required is a horizontal compression of the x-axis by a factor of 1/3. Additionally, the graph of y=6^x is translated by the vector [1; -2], resulting in the function f(x) = 6^(x-1) - 2. The confusion around matrix transformations is clarified, emphasizing that the translation can be understood as a simple shift rather than a matrix operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions, specifically y=6^x
  • Knowledge of geometric transformations in graphing
  • Familiarity with translation vectors in coordinate geometry
  • Basic concepts of function notation and transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study horizontal compression of graphs, particularly with exponential functions
  • Learn about vector translations in coordinate geometry
  • Explore the properties of exponential functions and their transformations
  • Review matrix transformations and their applications in graphing
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for mathematics exams, particularly those focusing on graph transformations and exponential functions, as well as educators teaching these concepts.

exis
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm sitting for an AQA exam tomorrow (Pure Maths MPC2) and while going through some past papers I encountered this problem which I'm not sure how to solve. I'd appreciate any help :)

Homework Statement


i) Describe a single geometrical transformation that maps the graph of y=6^x onto the graph of y=6^(3x).

ii) The graph of y=6^x is translated by the matrix [1; -2] (it is a 2x1 matrix) to give the graph of the curve with equation y=f(x) . Write down an expression for f(x).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are taking an exam in these, surely you must know something! What have you tried?
 
well, if i were doing the exam right now, for i) i'd say it would compress the x-axis
however I'm pretty uncertain about (ii)
 
while thinking about the second part I came up with two possible solutions which both seem right and ended up getting more confused

you shift every (x,y) points by the vector [1 -2] (ie move one to the right and down two)
or
use the matrix transformation equation and end up with y=x-2*6^x
 
exis said:
ii) The graph of y=6^x is translated by the matrix [1; -2] (it is a 2x1 matrix) to give the graph of the curve with equation y=f(x) . Write down an expression for f(x).

After some thought, I think what this means is that each point on the graph of y = 6^x is translated one unit right and two units down. The description is a bit confusing in its description of the graph being translated by a matrix. Although [1 -2]^T is indeed a matrix, it might have been clearer to describe this as a translation by an amount represented by the given vector.
 
Ok. I completely got it now. Thanks a lot for your help
 
And BTW, this has nothing to do with transformation matrices, which you used as the title for this thread.
 
Sorry about that. At the time I posted the problem I still thought that I needed to use the matrix transformation equation to solve it. The wording of the question confused me
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
19K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K