How Do You Solve a Second Order ODE Using Reduction of Order?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter praecox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reduction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by t²y'' - 4ty' + 6y = 0, with a known solution y₁ = t². The user successfully applies the reduction of order technique by substituting y = t²v(t) and derives the equation t⁴v'' = 0. The solution reveals that v(t) must be linear, leading to the conclusion that the second solution is y₂ = t³. This method effectively demonstrates the reduction of order technique in solving second-order ODEs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with the reduction of order method
  • Knowledge of differentiation and integration techniques
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of reduction of order in detail
  • Explore linear differential equations and their solutions
  • Learn about the Wronskian and its role in finding linearly independent solutions
  • Investigate other methods for solving second-order ODEs, such as the method of undetermined coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are working with differential equations, particularly those seeking to deepen their understanding of solving second-order ODEs using reduction of order.

praecox
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hey, guys. I'm having a hard time with a 2nd ODE reduction of order problem.

The DE is
t2y'' - 4ty' + 6y = 0, with y1 = t2.

So I set up my y = t2v(t); y' = t2v' + 2tv; y'' = t2v'' + 4tv' + 2v.
I then substituted back in and got:
t4v'' = 0

This is where I'm getting stuck. The book says that the answer I'm looking for is y2 = t3, but I can't seem to get there from here.

I don't think I can use an integrating factor here (if I'm wrong there let me know), so I tried separating the variables, but that got me no where. I think I did it wrong though.

Here was my separation of variables attempt:
letting w = v', so w' = v'':
t4dw/dt = 0
dw = t-4 dt
Integrating both sides (and taking constants of integration to be zero):
w = -1/3 t-3
since w = v':
dv = -1/3 t-3 dt
Integrating again to find v and still no where near t3.

Any ideas? Anybody? :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let y=tn
n(n-1)tn-4ntn+6tn=0
(n-2)(n-3)tn=0
n=2 or 3
 
praecox said:
Hey, guys. I'm having a hard time with a 2nd ODE reduction of order problem.

The DE is
t2y'' - 4ty' + 6y = 0, with y1 = t2.

So I set up my y = t2v(t); y' = t2v' + 2tv; y'' = t2v'' + 4tv' + 2v.
I then substituted back in and got:
t4v'' = 0


Any ideas? Anybody? :/

v"(t)=0 hence v(t) is linear. Choose v(t)=t so that y = t2v(t)=t3.
 
That makes so much sense now! Thank you so much! :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K