How Do You Verify Electrostatic Force via Direct Integration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Midas_Touch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on verifying the electrostatic force equation F = qE = -q²/(16πε₀d²) through direct integration. The challenge involves integrating the surface charge density σ_f(y,z) = -qd/(2π(d²+y²+z²)^(3/2)) to confirm the resultant Coulomb force between charge q and the induced charge. Participants express uncertainty about whether to integrate the surface charge density or the force itself, indicating a need for clarity in the problem's requirements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with surface charge density concepts
  • Knowledge of electric potential and its relation to electric fields
  • Proficiency in calculus, specifically integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Coulomb's law and its applications
  • Learn about surface charge density and its implications in electrostatics
  • Explore the relationship between electric potential and electric fields
  • Practice integration techniques relevant to physics problems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone involved in electrostatics or electrical engineering, particularly those interested in the mathematical verification of electrostatic forces.

Midas_Touch
The problem says

Verify by direct integration that

F= qE = - q^2/(16*pi*epsilon_0*d^2) in the "x unit" direction

is the resultant of the Coloumb force between q and the induced charge described by

sigma_f(y,z) = -qd/(2*pi*(d^2+y^2+z^2)^3/2

-------------

Okay, I am not sure what to integrate here. Do I integrate the surface charge density or the force?

Thank you,
Midas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F = -dU and -(grad V) = E so maybe your suppose to verify electric potential by integrating qE along x. I'm not sure exactly what they are asking for either...
 
Please note that the OP is nearly 5 yrs old. I would assume this homework problem has long neen resolved.

Thread Locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
969
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K