How Does Angular Velocity Affect a Block on a Rotating Wedge?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a block resting on an inclined wedge that is fixed to a rotating turntable. Participants explore the effects of angular velocity on the block's motion, focusing on the components of acceleration, the forces acting on the block, and the conditions required to prevent the block from sliding down the wedge. The scope includes theoretical analysis and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using polar coordinates to analyze the motion of the block, noting that the radial distance remains constant while the angular position changes.
  • There is a discussion about the components of acceleration, with some participants proposing that the acceleration can be expressed in terms of centripetal acceleration and gravitational forces acting on the block.
  • Participants debate the role of friction and the normal force, with some asserting that the normal force must account for the centripetal force, while others express uncertainty about how to express these forces mathematically.
  • One participant proposes that the component of centripetal force acting parallel to the slope is influenced by gravitational forces, while another emphasizes that the frictional force should be treated as an unknown in their equations.
  • There are differing views on the expressions for acceleration, with some participants arriving at different formulations for the minimum angular velocity required to keep the block from sliding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the expressions for acceleration or the minimum angular velocity. Multiple competing views remain regarding the treatment of forces and the resulting equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and roles of the forces involved, particularly the normal force and friction. There are unresolved mathematical steps in deriving the expressions for acceleration and the conditions for equilibrium.

Ciaran
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I've come across the following question and drawn a free body diagram:
A wedge with face inclined at an angle θ to the horizontal is fixed to a rotating
turntable. A block of mass m rests on the inclined plane and the coefficient of
static friction between the block and the wedge is µ. The block is to remain at
position R from the centre of rotation of the turntable.
a)If the general acceleration vector in planar polar coordinates is given by (see attachment), show that the acceleration of the block is a = −Rω^2 rˆ, where ω is the angular velocity of the turntable.
b) Find the components of the block’s acceleration parallel and vertical to the
inclined plane.
c)Find the minimum angular velocity ω to keep the block from sliding down
the face of the wedge

Now, I know I have to use cylindrical coordinates with z being constant due to no vertical motion.I can also show the expression for the acceleration using a free body diagram, but not using the expression attached. However, I get the gist of the expression attached as I see that omega squared is (d(theta)/ dt )^2, it's just actually using it to answer part a). And for the rest of the question, I feel I need to use the expression for part a) so am not confident on how to proceed.

I've done quite a few problems involving spherical coordinates and the like, but this one has really stumped me! Any help would be much appreciated

View attachment 4136
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-03-20 at 17.03.05.png
    Screen Shot 2015-03-20 at 17.03.05.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 134
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ciaran said:
Hi there,

I've come across the following question and drawn a free body diagram:
A wedge with face inclined at an angle θ to the horizontal is fixed to a rotating
turntable. A block of mass m rests on the inclined plane and the coefficient of
static friction between the block and the wedge is µ. The block is to remain at
position R from the centre of rotation of the turntable.
a)If the general acceleration vector in planar polar coordinates is given by (see attachment), show that the acceleration of the block is a = −Rω^2 rˆ, where ω is the angular velocity of the turntable.
b) Find the components of the block’s acceleration parallel and vertical to the
inclined plane.
c)Find the minimum angular velocity ω to keep the block from sliding down
the face of the wedge

Now, I know I have to use cylindrical coordinates with z being constant due to no vertical motion.I can also show the expression for the acceleration using a free body diagram, but not using the expression attached. However, I get the gist of the expression attached as I see that omega squared is (d(theta)/ dt )^2, it's just actually using it to answer part a). And for the rest of the question, I feel I need to use the expression for part a) so am not confident on how to proceed.

I've done quite a few problems involving spherical coordinates and the like, but this one has really stumped me! Any help would be much appreciated

Hi Ciaran!

In polar coordinates the block has coordinates $(r(t),\theta(t))$. For short: $(r,\theta)$.

If the block is to remain at position R from the center, that implies that $r(t)=R=constant$.
Consequently the first and second derivatives with respect to time are: $\dot r = \ddot r = 0$.

Similarly, the angular velocity has to remain constant at angular velocity $\omega$.
That means that $\dot \theta = \omega = constant$ and thus $\ddot \theta = 0$.

What do you get if you fill all that in into the general expression for acceleration in polar coordinates that you have? (Wondering)
$\mathbf a = (\ddot r-r\dot\theta^2)\mathbf{\hat r} + (r\ddot \theta + 2\dot r \dot \theta)\boldsymbol{\hat \theta} \tag 1$
 
Hello! I do indeed get the expression needed ! So for b), do I need to use the two components of the acceleration from part a)? And for c), do I simply need to consider the component of weight down the slope, the centripetal force and the force of friction?
 
Ciaran said:
Hello! I do indeed get the expression needed ! So for b), do I need to use the two components of the acceleration from part a)? And for c), do I simply need to consider the component of weight down the slope, the centripetal force and the force of friction?

I suggest drawing a Free Body Diagram (FBD) showing the block on the incline and all forces working on the block.
They have to add up to the required centripetal acceleration that you've found in a).

Apparently you've already figured out which forces there are, except that you've missed one: the normal force.
So indeed, you need to express them in formulas and put them in 2 equations.

For c) you need to replace the force of friction by the maximum possible friction.
 
So for parallel to the slope, I have a= g sinθ (1-µ) as force up slope= force down slope as it isn't moving. For vertically, I feel like I'm missing something because isn't it just zero?
 
Ciaran said:
So for parallel to the slope, I have a= g sinθ (1-µ) as force up slope= force down slope as it isn't moving. For vertically, I feel like I'm missing something because isn't it just zero?

For b) you can't assume that the force of friction is equal to the maximum possible friction - it is just an unknown force.
Moreover, the normal force is not equal to the mg sinθ. For starters it should be a cosine instead of a sine. But even then, they are not equal.
The normal force will be bigger. That's because it has to bring in part of the centripetal force.

Furthermore, this is not the centripetal acceleration, but only its component that is parallel to the slope.
The real centripetal acceleration is horizontal instead of parallel to the slope.

For the perpendicular forces the same applies: they do not cancel, since they have to result in the perpendicular component of the centripetal force.
 
So, vertically, the component of centripetal force is the normal force minus mgcosθ. And, parallel to the slope, the component of centripetal force is mgsinθ minus the unknown frictional force?
 
Ciaran said:
So, vertically, the component of centripetal force is the normal force minus mgcosθ. And, parallel to the slope, the component of centripetal force is mgsinθ minus the unknown frictional force?

I suggest to avoid the word vertical here - it's confusing - I'd call it perpendicular (to the slope). (Nerd)

But yes, that's it. (Nod)
 
Ahh I see, I can see how it could lead to confusion! But then how am I meant to derive 2 expressions for acceleration if I have unknown forces? I don't know how to express the friction or the normal force
 
  • #10
Ciaran said:
Ahh I see, I can see how it could lead to confusion! But then how am I meant to derive 2 expressions for acceleration if I have unknown forces? I don't know how to express the friction or the normal force

For b) you'll have to leave friction as an unknown force.
You can set up 2 equations though, including the centripetal acceleration of $\omega^2 R$.

For c) you can set the force of friction to its maximum of $\mu N$ and find $\omega$ as a function of $\theta$ and $R$.
 
  • #11
Is it just a_ perp= (N/m)- gcosθ and a_ parallel= gsinθ- (F_f/m) ? And for c), I get ω= sqrt( (g/R)(μsinθ- tanθ))
 
  • #12
Ciaran said:
Is it just a_ perp= (N/m)- gcosθ and a_ parallel= gsinθ- (F_f/m) ?

Yes.

And for c), I get ω= sqrt( (g/R)(μsinθ- tanθ))

I get a different trigonometric fraction, so one of us must have made a mistake.
But yes, it should be something like that.
 
  • #13
Really? That seems quite messy and bitty! What did you get as your answer? I started off with mgsinθ +mRω^2 cosθ = μmg cosθsinθ and simplified for omega from there
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K