How Does Chaplygin Gas Unify Dark Energy and Dark Matter?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kptsilva
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Chaplygin gas model and its implications for unifying dark energy and dark matter. Participants are seeking clarification on the model's equations and their application, particularly in relation to boundary conditions in a specific equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Homework-related, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to understand the Chaplygin gas model and shares a research paper for reference.
  • Another participant requests clarification on which specific aspects are confusing.
  • A participant mentions difficulties in plotting a specific graph related to the model due to a lack of boundary conditions.
  • Another participant asserts that the equation is linear in b, suggesting that the ratio b/b(a_eq) should not depend on the initial condition, implying a potential error in calculations.
  • A participant questions how to solve a second-order partial differential equation without two boundary conditions, highlighting a concern about the problem's formulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the handling of boundary conditions in the context of the Chaplygin gas model, and there are differing views on the implications of the linearity of the equation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved issues regarding the necessary boundary conditions for solving the equations and the implications of the linearity of the equation in b.

kptsilva
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I learning about the unification of dark energy and dark matter via chaplygin gas equation. Can anyone help me understand this model? here is a research paper.

arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0202064v2.pdf

Thank you
 
Space news on Phys.org
Can you be more specific? What part don't you get?
 
I'm having trouble in plotting the graph b/b(a_eq) vs. a (eq 36) since they've only given one boundary condition. I've taken another b.c to be b(a_eq)=1, but the correct plots are not obtained
 
The equation is linear in b, so b/b(a_eq) should be independent of the initial condition. You are calculating something wrong.
 
ya,but how do i solve the equation 36 without 2 boundary conditions? (since it is a second order pde)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K