MHB How Does Constant Acceleration Affect Car Speed Over Time?

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
2.3.16 A car is traveling at $45 \, km/h$ at time $t=0$ It accelerates at a constant rate of $10 \, km/h\, s$
(a) How fast is the care going at $t=1\, s$?
$$v_t=v_0+at=45+10(1)=55\,\dfrac{km}{h}$$
at $t=2\,s$
$$v_t=v_0+at=45+10(2)=45+20=60\,\dfrac{km}{h}$$
(b) What is its speed at a general time t

ok this is a very simple problem but when you have constant acceleration there is no power on s?
also (b) what is meant by general time t is that an average or an equation.also typos perhaps...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
2.3.16 A car is traveling at $45 \, km/h$ at time $t=0$ It accelerates at a constant rate of $10 \, km/h\, s$
(a) How fast is the care going at $t=1\, s$?
$$v_t=v_0+at=45+10(1)=55\,\dfrac{km}{h}$$
at $t=2\,s$
$$v_t=v_0+at=45+10(2)=45+20=60\,\dfrac{km}{h}$$
(b) What is its speed at a general time t

ok this is a very simple problem but when you have constant acceleration there is no power on s?
also (b) what is meant by general time t is that an average or an equation.also typos perhaps...
First of all we need to fix that unit in the acceleration, which is a bit weird. Since a) is putting time in seconds, then let's get the acceleration to km/s^2:
[math]\dfrac{10 ~\text{km}}{\text{h s}} \cdot \dfrac{10 ~ \text{h}}{3600 ~ \text{s}} = 0.278 ~ \text{km/}s^2[/math]

Now use [math]v_0 + at[/math].

-Dan
 
I disagree with Dan. Since we want the speed, in km/h, after t seconds, an acceleration in "km/hs", kilometers per hour per second, is simple and perfectly reasonable.

Now, to the given question. (a) asked for the speed after 1 second at an acceleration of 10 km/hs. Yes, multiplying 10 km/hs
by 1 second
gives an increase of 10 km/h so the speed goes from 55 km/h to 65 km/h. I notice that you next give the speed after 2 seconds acceleration. That doesn't appear to have been asked but it was not a bad thing to do- you multiplied 10 km/hs by 2 seconds to get an increase of 20 km/h. What if, instead of "1 second" or "2 seconds" you were told the acceleration lasted for "t seconds". You would do exactly the same thing: multiply 10 km/hs by t seconds to get an increase in speed of 10t km/h.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top