How Does Exchange Energy Influence Ionization in Transition Metals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mooncrater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Exchange
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 5K views
mooncrater
Messages
215
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


While reading d and f block elements from my book I got this line:
"The irregular trend in the first ionization enthalpy of the 3d metals can be accounted for considering that the removal of one electron alters the relative energies of 4s and 3d orbitals. So the unipositive ions have dn configurations with no 4s electrons. There is thus a REORGANISATION ENERGY accompanying ionisation with some gains in exchange energy as the number of electrons increases and from the transference of s electrons into d orbitals. "

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, if any unipositive element has dn configuration then why would it have no electrons in its s orbital? (As the second line says)
And the third line, I didn't get anything of it... [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simon Bridge said:
The context suggests that, prior to ionization, there was only one 4s electron.
I think you're saying it on behalf of:
mooncrater said:
considering that the removal of one electron alters the relative energies of 4s and 3d orbitals.
Am I correct?
Though now I understand the second line, but third one is still a mile away from my understanding.