How Does Expanding a Quantum Potential Well Affect Particle Probability?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving an infinitely deep one-dimensional potential well. The original poster describes a scenario where a particle in the ground state of a well, initially spanning from x = 0 to x = a, is subjected to an expansion of the well to span from x = 0 to x = 2a. The focus is on determining the probabilities of finding the particle in the ground and first excited states of the new potential well.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of wave functions for the particle-in-a-box problem, questioning the validity of using certain boundary conditions and the implications of the wave number k being an integer. There are inquiries about calculating probabilities and the concept of overlapping wave functions between the two states.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various aspects of the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to consider overlapping wave functions, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach or solution. Participants express confusion about the calculations required to determine probabilities.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the problem being a bonus homework assignment, indicating that it may not have been covered in the participants' coursework, which could contribute to their uncertainty regarding the calculations involved.

evildarklord1985
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Quantum mechanics- help!?

An innitely deep one-dimensional potential well runs from x = 0 to x = a. Let a particle be placed in the
ground state corresponding to this system. Then, within innitly short time, expand the potential well so that it now runs from x = 0 to x = 2a. If the energy of this particle is now measured, what is the probability of nding it in the ground state corresponding to this new system.? What is the probability of nding it in the rst excited state state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I wrote in the second question of yours, show work done and forumlas/relations that you know, then someone will try to help you.
 
sorry...i thought of using the same method we normally do for particle-in-the-box problem, where psi(x) = A sin(kx) + B cos(kx) . Then, using boundary condition of psi(x)=0 at x=0 , and x=2a...

From, psi(0) = 0, B =0

From , psi(2a) =0 ; I got : A sin(2ka) = 0
So, 2ka = n * pi
or, k = n*pi/2a

but can k be a non-interger? I'm confused... is this right way to approach the solution for the above problem?
 
Why CANT k be a non-integer? give me a reason..

2ka = n*pi, where n=1,2,3,... does k have to be an integer?
 
oh ok...so with this expression of k , I can write the energy level equation as :
E= n^2 * h^2 / 16m a^2...but the question asks about finding the probability of finding the particle. Isn't the total probability just 1 in the whole space?
 
No, that was not the question...
 
so, how do i go from what i had to get the solution? I'm confused...how do you actually calculate the probability of finding a particle in its certain state of energy level? All I know is probability of finding the particle in a region of the box...
 
You have that the particle is in the ground state of an infinite well with length a. The suddenly the well gets length 2a. What is the probability that the particle is in the ground state of that well?

now you have two wave functions, and you shall find out how much they "overlap"

You must have covered this in your course..
 
sorry i don't think i encountered any kinds of problem like this in the course...this is a bonus homework of my professor to toture us for Spring break...anyway, what kind of calculation can you do to calculate the overlapping probability you mentioned?
 
  • #10
You don't have a textbook either?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K