How Does Gravity Influence Our Understanding of Time Since the Big Bang?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TungstenX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the influence of gravity on the understanding of time since the Big Bang, exploring concepts of time dilation, cosmological time, and the reference points used in measuring the universe's age. Participants engage with theoretical implications and the nature of time in relation to gravity, particularly during the early moments of the universe's expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that time is not linear or constant and is influenced by gravity, particularly during the early moments of the Big Bang.
  • One participant questions the reference point used for measuring the universe's age, suggesting that Earth was not present at the beginning.
  • Another participant asserts that time dilates in a gravity well and for rapidly moving objects, but expresses uncertainty about the implications of this on the Big Bang.
  • Some argue that cosmological time is defined by observers at rest with galaxies, suggesting that all events can be considered simultaneous within their respective frames.
  • There is a contention regarding whether time is constant, with some asserting it is constant for individual observers while others argue that atomic clocks measure time differently under varying gravitational conditions.
  • One participant introduces the concept of cosmic time, stating that it is a universal measure that can differ from local measurements due to irregularities caused by massive objects.
  • Questions are raised about the origins of the universe in the quantum realm, with some suggesting it began everywhere rather than from a specific point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of time, with no consensus reached on whether time is constant or how gravity affects it. The discussion includes competing models and interpretations of cosmological time and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining time in cosmological contexts, noting that definitions may depend on the observer's frame of reference and the presence of gravitational fields. There are also unresolved questions regarding the implications of quantum mechanics on the origins of the universe.

TungstenX
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Good day All,

Our current understanding of time is that it is not linear or constant; just add gravity.

I've heard a lot about the time scale of the big bang. Now do science take into account the vast difference of gravity (concentration of gravity) during the first few minutes of the big bang?

What is the reference point use in measuring the universe's age / time scales? (Earth? - it was not there when all this started)

As the universe expanse, does the universe's average / general time accelerate? (Gravity diluting in space)

Just a few thoughts on time.


TX
 
Space news on Phys.org
TungstenX said:
Good day All,

Our current understanding of time is that it is not linear or constant; just add gravity.

I've heard a lot about the time scale of the big bang. Now do science take into account the vast difference of gravity (concentration of gravity) during the first few minutes of the big bang?

What is the reference point use in measuring the universe's age / time scales? (Earth? - it was not there when all this started)

As the universe expanse, does the universe's average / general time accelerate? (Gravity diluting in space)

Just a few thoughts on time.TX
This doesn't make any sense to me. Time isn't a thing that can move or accelerate. Time is a direction of motion.
 
Last edited:
yes time does dilate in a gravity well and it dilates for rapidly moving objects.
your question is reasonable but I don't know that anyone will be able to answer you.

the 'official' answer is that space wasnt expanding into a pre-existing space and therefore it shouldn't have had a velocity nor should it have experienced any gravity.
but nobody really knows.
 
An 8 Billion year old alien civilisation may know :)
 
(Earth? - it was not there when all this started)
Of course it was there. Everything was.
Cosmological time is the proper time measured by observers at rest with, say, galaxies. So every galaxy has its own time, and you define "the universe at cosmological time 13.7 Gy" is the set of all events (at all the galaxies) where the respective proper time since Big Bang is 13.7 Gy. That's just a definition so far.
The remarkable thing is that all these events seem to be simultaneous with their respective neighbouring events. So you can define a reasonable notion of "now", and you find that - using this notion - every component of the universe is of the same age, and born at the same time. That's nontrivial, and the basis of the Standard Model.

Gravitational time dilation uses a different definition of "now". Using this definition, the Big Bang happens now and is ~25 Gly away. That's not "cosmological" time.
 
Time is constant just not with respect to others in motion or those near massive bodies, it is always constant for you though.
 
I don't think time is constant (either is the perception of time). Atomic clocks runs at different times when at different gravities. (gravity field strengths)
 
I googled "cosmological time" and I found this definition:
"This way there is also cosmological time, which for an observer at a fixed spatial point in comoving coordinates is identical to her local measurement of time."
(http://www.fact-index.com/c/co/comoving_distance.html" )

So it's proper time not coordinate time.
If you would use coordinate time then Big Bang should have happened at infinite past.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TungstenX said:
I don't think time is constant (either is the perception of time). Atomic clocks runs at different times when at different gravities. (gravity field strengths)

TungstenX,

The Universe contains Space and Time and does not exist in Space and Time. The central tenant in Cosmology is the Cosmological principle, which states that the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic. All places are alike. A consequence of this principle is that all clocks in the Universe, apart from local irregularities, agree in their intervals of time. This universal time is also known as cosmic time, and departures from cosmic time are caused by local irregularities (e.g. massive, compact objects).

Instead of focusing on time, by itself, one must also incorporate space. The fusion of these two yields an invariant quantity. All space-time intervals are invariant. All observers, independent of their relative motion, will measure the same space-time interval between events.
 
  • #10
From where started the Universe in the quantum world?
Started from a volume = mass of the universe divided by Planck density
 
  • #11
universe11 said:
From where started the Universe in the quantum world?
Started from a volume = mass of the universe divided by Planck density

The simple answer to where the Universe began is that it began everywhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K