How Does Mass Increase as Electrons Approach Light Speed in a Synchrotron?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Speed
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
19 replies · 2K views
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Fast electrons in synchrotron approach the speed of light:
Snap2.jpg

I don't get to the "one part in 8,000,000"

Homework Equations


Momentum: ##~P=mv=\frac{m_0v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}##

The Attempt at a Solution


$$\frac{v^2}{c^2}=1-\frac{1}{4E6}~\rightarrow~\frac{v}{c}=\frac{1}{1.000,000,5}$$
$$\rightarrow~v=\frac{c}{1.000,000,5}$$
$$c-v=c\left( 1-\frac{1}{1.000,000,5} \right) \neq c\cdot \frac{1}{8,000,000}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haruspex said:
How do you get that?
I executed ##~1-\frac{1}{4E6}##
What do you mean by (1-¼1016)? maybe you made a mistake, do you mean the Taylor expansion for ##~\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{4E6}}~##?
Taylor expansion:
$$f(x+h)=f(x)+hf'(x)+\frac{h^2}{2!}f''(x)+...$$
It has a function f(x) in it and i don't, i just have numbers, so how will i take derivative?
 
I am not sure why you need Taylor Series to approximate it. You could do this: let r = (v/c). Then we have (1 - r^2) = (1 + r)(1 - r).
Since v differs from c by 1 part in 8 million, then (1 + r) is approx 2 {since r is approx 1}, and (1 - r) is 1 divided by 8 million. So you have: (1 - r^2) is approx 2/(8 million) = 1/(4 million).
The square root of that is 1/2000. You could run this in reverse, if you know the 2000 and want to determine the 1/(8 million).
 
Last edited:
I've seen the Taylor polynomial approximation used in quantum mechanics if there's a need to include the relativistic "mass increase" in the form of a lowest order perturbation in the Schrödinger equation, but I'm not sure why that is done here.
 
This is all based on, for small ##\epsilon##:

##\frac{1}{1 \pm \epsilon} = 1 \mp \epsilon##

And

##(1 + \epsilon)^2 = 1 + 2\epsilon##

In particular, if ##\frac{v}{c} = 1- \epsilon##, then ##\frac{v^2}{c^2} = 1- 2\epsilon## and ##1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2} = 2\epsilon##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
Karol said:

Homework Statement


Fast electrons in synchrotron approach the speed of light:
View attachment 204548
I don't get to the "one part in 8,000,000"

The positive solution of ##1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2} = 2000## is ##\beta = \sqrt{3,999,999}/2000##, so ##1 - \beta = 0.1250 \times 10^{-6} = 1/8,000,000.##

Actually, that last should be ##1/7,999,999.500000031250##, approximately
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
And I meant binomial expansion
But in binomial expansion the exponents are positive integers
scottdave said:
and (1 - r) is 1 divided by 8 million.
Why?
$$c-v=\frac{1}{8E6},~1-r=1-\frac{v}{c}=\frac{c-v}{c}=\frac{1/8E6}{c}=\frac{1}{c\cdot 8E6}$$
PeroK said:
This is all based on, for small ##\epsilon##:

##\frac{1}{1 \pm \epsilon} = 1 \mp \epsilon##

And

##(1 + \epsilon)^2 = 1 + 2\epsilon##

In particular, if ##\frac{v}{c} = 1- \epsilon##, then ##\frac{v^2}{c^2} = 1- 2\epsilon## and ##1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2} = 2\epsilon##
But you don't use ##\frac{1}{1 \pm \epsilon} = 1 \mp \epsilon##, you logically and correctly say ##\frac{v}{c} = 1- \epsilon##
$$\frac{v}{c} = 1- \epsilon~\rightarrow~\frac{v^2}{c^2}=(1-\epsilon)^2=1-2\epsilon+\epsilon^2 \approx 1-2\epsilon$$
$$1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}=\frac{1}{4E6}=2\epsilon~\rightarrow~\epsilon=\frac{1}{8E6}$$
$$\frac{v}{c}=1-\frac{1}{8E6},~~c-v=\frac{c}{8E8}$$
 
Karol said:
But in binomial expansion the exponents are positive integers
Why?
$$c-v=\frac{1}{8E6},~1-r=1-\frac{v}{c}=\frac{c-v}{c}=\frac{1/8E6}{c}=\frac{1}{c\cdot 8E6}$$

But you don't use ##\frac{1}{1 \pm \epsilon} = 1 \mp \epsilon##, you logically and correctly say ##\frac{v}{c} = 1- \epsilon##
$$\frac{v}{c} = 1- \epsilon~\rightarrow~\frac{v^2}{c^2}=(1-\epsilon)^2=1-2\epsilon+\epsilon^2 \approx 1-2\epsilon$$
$$1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}=\frac{1}{4E6}=2\epsilon~\rightarrow~\epsilon=\frac{1}{8E6}$$
$$\frac{v}{c}=1-\frac{1}{8E6},~~c-v=\frac{c}{8E8}$$
That looks right to me.
 
Karol said:
Why?
$$c-v=\frac{1}{8E6},~1-r=1-\frac{v}{c}=\frac{c-v}{c}=\frac{1/8E6}{c}=\frac{1}{c\cdot 8E6}$$
You should notice something that when you see: c - v = 1/(8 E6). On the left side, you have speed (Length/Time), and the right side is dimensionless. So something didn't get put in, correctly. Now with this: c-v = c/(8 E6), both sides have the same dimensions.
 
c-v = c/(8 E6) has correct dimensions and, as PeroK said, is probably the correct answer but how do you explain "v differs from c by one part in 8,000,000"?
I expected to see c-v=1/8,000,000
 
Karol said:
c-v = c/(8 E6) has correct dimensions and, as PeroK said, is probably the correct answer but how do you explain "v differs from c by one part in 8,000,000"?
I expected to see c-v=1/8,000,000
Well, you expected wrong. That equation is dimensionally nonsense.
 
Ray Vickson said:
The positive solution of ##1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2} = 2000## is ##\beta = \sqrt{3,999,999}/2000##
How did you get that?
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}=2000~\rightarrow~\sqrt{1-\beta^2}=0.0005~\rightarrow~\beta=0.999,999,875$$
 
Karol said:
How did you get that?
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}=2000~\rightarrow~\sqrt{1-\beta^2}=0.0005~\rightarrow~\beta=0.999,999,875$$
I am lazy in my old age, so I just let Maple solve the problem for me, and then evaluated the solution using 20-digit numerical computations.

Of course, the solution of ##1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2} = \gamma## is ##\beta = \sqrt{1-\gamma^{-2}},## which expands out as
$$\beta = 1 -\frac{1}{2 \gamma^2} -\frac{1}{8 \gamma^4} - \cdots,$$
by applying the series expansion for ##\sqrt{1-x}## for small ##x = 1/\gamma^2.## If you keep only the ##1/\gamma^2## term you get exactly 1 part in 8,000,000 because we are using ##\gamma = 2000.##
 
What if it said something like v differed from c by 1%, would it be clear that v = 0.99c ?
Instead of 1% they could say v differs from c by 1 part in 100. It means the same thing.

So instead of 1 part in 8million difference, they could say differ by 0.0000125%
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Karol and PeroK
Thank you very much scottdave, PeroK, Ray, Hllbert2 and Haruspex
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave