How Does Morphism Affect Prime Spectra and Module Support?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2017
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between morphisms of commutative rings and their effects on prime spectra and module support. Specifically, it establishes that for a morphism $\phi : R \to S$, the induced map $\phi^* : \operatorname{Spec}(S) \to \operatorname{Spec}(R)$ satisfies $\phi^*(\mathfrak{q}) = \phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$. Furthermore, it concludes that if $X$ is a finitely generated $R$-module, then the support of the tensor product $S \otimes_R X$ corresponds to the inverse image of the support of $X$ under the morphism $\phi^*$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative rings with unity
  • Familiarity with prime spectra, specifically $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$
  • Knowledge of finitely generated modules over rings
  • Basic concepts of tensor products in module theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of morphisms between commutative rings
  • Explore the concept of prime spectra in depth, particularly $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$
  • Learn about the support of modules and its implications in algebra
  • Investigate tensor products of modules and their applications in algebraic geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying commutative algebra, particularly those interested in the interplay between ring theory and module theory.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Given commutative rings with unity $R$ and $S$, let $\phi : R \to S$ be a morphism of rings. It induces a morphism $\phi^* : \operatorname{Spec}(S) \to \operatorname{Spec}(R)$ of prime spectra such that $\phi^*(\mathfrak{q}) = \phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$ for all $\mathfrak{q}\in \operatorname{Spec}(S)$. Show that if $X$ is a finitely generated $R$-module, the support of $S\otimes_R X$ is the inverse image of the support of $X$ under the induced map $\phi^*$.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to give one extra week for members to attempt a solution.
 
No one answered this week's problem. You can read my solution below.
If $\mathfrak{a}$ is an ideal of $R$, let $\mathfrak{a}^e$ denote the extension of $\mathfrak{a}$ in $S$. Let $x_1,\ldots, x_n$ be generators of $M$. If $\mathfrak{a}_i := \operatorname{Ann}(x_i)$, then $$S\otimes_R X \approx \sum S\otimes_R Rx_i \approx \sum S\otimes_R R/\mathfrak{a}_i \approx \sum S/\mathfrak{a}_i^e$$ Thus $$\operatorname{Supp}(S\otimes_R X) = \bigcup \operatorname{Supp}(S/\mathfrak{a}_i^e) = \bigcup V(\mathcal{a}_i^e) = \bigcup \phi^{*-1}(V(\mathfrak{a}_i)) = \phi^{*-1}(\cup V(\mathfrak{a}_i)) = \phi^{*-1}(\operatorname{Ann}(X)) = \phi^{*-1}(\operatorname{Supp}(X))$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K