How Does P(n,r) / n Relate to P(n-1,r-1) in Combinatorial Proofs?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the permutations P(n,r) and P(n-1,r-1) in combinatorial proofs, specifically examining the equation P(n,r) / n = P(n-1,r-1). Participants are exploring the definitions and properties of permutations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to prove the relationship between P(n,r) and P(n-1,r-1) through algebraic manipulation and specific examples. There are questions about the correctness of formulas and the interpretation of permutations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the algebra involved in the proof. Some participants express confidence in their understanding, while others seek clarification on specific steps and concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of confusion regarding algebraic steps and the implications of using specific examples versus general proofs. Participants also reflect on their mathematical background and the challenges they face with algebra.

Styx
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Prove that P(n,r) / n = P(n-1,r-1)

I know that it is right but I have having a hard time coming up with a step by step solution.

Is P(n-1,r-1) the same as (n-1)!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a concrete example. P(7,3)=7*6*5, P(6,2)=6*5. So is P(7,3)/7=P(6,2)? Yes. Is P(6,2)=6!? NO. What's the general formula for P(n,r)?
 
Last edited:
I know that the statement is true but I don't think I can use a specific example as that would be conjecture and not a proof.

P(n,r)= n!/(n-r)! = n x (n-1) x (n-2) x ... x (n - r + 1)
 
Last edited:
P(n-1,r-1)=(n-1)! is false. If P(n,r)=n!/(n-r)!, what's the correct formula for P(n-1,r-1)?
 
P(n,r)/n = (n-1)!

No...
P(n,r)/n= n!/(n-r)!/n = n x (n-1) x (n-2) x ... x (n - r + 1)/n =
(n-1) x (n-2) x ... x (n - r + 1) = (n-1) x (n-2) x ... x (n - (r - 1) )

Can you solve it from there?
 
Brilliant!
 
Ok, how about this:

P(n,r)/n = n!/(n-r)!/n = (n-1)!/(n-r)! = P(n-1, r-1)

EDIT:

Actually, wouldn't (n-1)!/(n-r)! be P(n-1, r)?

6!/3! = 120, 120/6 = 20
5!/3! = 20
while 5!/2! = 60
 
Last edited:
I thought you had it. P(n-1,r-1)=(n-1)!/((n-1)-(r-1))!, right? Just substitute n-1 for n and r-1 for r in P(n,r). Can you simplify that expression slightly?
 
I understand everything except how r/n becomes r-1

n!/n = (n-1)!
(n-r)!/n = ((n-1)-(r/n))!
 
  • #10
Styx said:
I understand everything except how r/n becomes r-1

n!/n = (n-1)!
(n-r)!/n = ((n-1)-(r/n))!

You are doing some silly algebra. (n!/(n-r)!)/n=(n!/n)/(n-r)!. You don't divide (n-r)! by n also.
 
  • #11
Ok, so I was right before.

n!/(n-r)!/n = (n-1)!/(n-r)!

but (n-r)! is equal to ((n-1)-(r-1))!

therefore, n!/(n-r)!/n = (n-1)!/((n-1)-(r-1))!

(n-1)!/((n-1)-(r-1)) = P(n-1, r-1)

therefore, n!/(n-r)!/n = P(n-1, r-1)

Dick said:
You are doing some silly algebra

You have no idea how much trouble my algebra gets me into. Here I am doing grade 12 Geometry and I should probably be reviewing my grade 9 algebra instead...
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Styx said:
Ok, so I was right before.

n!/(n-r)!/n = (n-1)!/(n-r)!

but (n-r)! is equal to ((n-1)-(r-1))!

therefore, n!/(n-r)!/n = (n-1)!/((n-1)-(r-1))!

(n-1)!/((n-1)-(r-1)) = P(n-1, r-1)

therefore, n!/(n-r)!/n = P(n-1, r-1)



You have no idea how much trouble my algebra gets me into. Here I am doing grade 12 Geometry and I should probably be reviewing my grade 9 algebra instead...

Yessssssssss
 
  • #13
Thanks Dick. It must hurt to help sometimes...
 
  • #14
Styx said:
Thanks Dick. It must hurt to help sometimes...

It only hurts when they never get it.
 
  • #15
Styx said:
Prove that P(n,r) / n = P(n-1,r-1)

I know that it is right but I have having a hard time coming up with a step by step solution.

Is P(n-1,r-1) the same as (n-1)!

L.H.S
p(n,r)/n
= n!/n(n-r)!
= n (n-1)!/n(n-r)!
= (n-1)!/(n-r)!
= P (n-1,r-1)
= R.H.S
 
  • #16
now you should do a combinatorial (or counting in two ways) proof for fun
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K