How does quantum superposition really work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of quantum superposition (QSP) and its implications in quantum mechanics and quantum computing. Participants explore the nature of superposition, its mathematical representation, and its application in different contexts, including quantum states and measurement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how quantum superposition works, likening it to magic, while acknowledging its acceptance in quantum mechanics.
  • Others argue that superposition can be understood through the lens of vector decomposition, similar to classical mechanics, suggesting that it is not inherently magical.
  • A participant questions whether the concept of superposition is sufficient to explain quantum computing, implying that additional concepts are necessary.
  • It is proposed that quantum states can be expressed as linear combinations of basis states, with the choice of basis affecting the representation of the state.
  • One participant illustrates the concept of superposition using the example of photon polarization, explaining how different bases can lead to different representations of the same physical state.
  • There is a suggestion that the choice of basis can simplify calculations in quantum mechanics, depending on the experimental context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of quantum superposition, with some viewing it as a straightforward extension of classical concepts, while others maintain that it requires a deeper understanding beyond mere vector decomposition.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the choice of basis for representing quantum states, as well as the potential complexities involved in understanding quantum mechanics and its applications.

Curious Cat
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I understand how to put a quantum particle into a superposition, by
passing it thru 2 slits or a beam splitter, which U can say actually
splits the wave, function, but
How does putting it potentially inbetween 2 basis states, which U
will measure only later, on, do it!? That seems like magic, to me. And
yet I accept that it does. Somehow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you ever studied vectors? E.g. although gravity is a vertical force, we can decompose it into components in any basis. E.g. when analysing motion along an inclined plane we decompose it into components normal to and tangential to the plane.

That's superposition. Not magic!
 
PeroK said:
Have you ever studied vectors? E.g. although gravity is a vertical force, we can decompose it into components in any basis. E.g. when analysing motion along an inclined plane we decompose it into components normal to and tangential to the plane.

That's superposition. Not magic!
Thank you, for your reply:
Well, yes, of course.
Are you saying that that's all QSP is!?
Then how does that explain the quantum computers?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Curious Cat said:
Thank you for your reply:
. Well, yes, of course.
. Are you saying that that's all QSP is!?
Then how does that explain the quantum computers?
That's all superposition is: quantum States are (abstract) vectors and may be expressed in any basis - which means an infinite choice of superposition for any state.

It takes more than the concept of superposition to explain QM and quantum computers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattt
Curious Cat said:
How does putting it potentially inbetween 2 basis states, which U
will measure only later, on, do it!?
As @PeroK says above, states add like vectors so any state can be written as the sum (more precisely, a linear combination) of other states. Typically when we start in on a problem we choose a set of vectors that we call the basis, and then we write everything else as a superposition of these basis vectors; but we could choose a different basis and then some of the states that were written as superpositions before might no longer be.

For example: Let's call the photon state that we informally describe as "polarized at a 45-degree angle clockwise" ##|45\rangle##; there's a state that is orthogonal to that one, we'll call it ##|-45\rangle##. If we choose to use these two vectors as our basis then we would write the state of a vertically polarized photon as the superposition ##\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(|45\rangle+|-45\rangle)##. However, we could also choose to use the states "polarized vertically" and "polarized horizontally" as our basis (let's call them ##|V\rangle## and ##|H\rangle##); now the state of a vertically polarized photon would be written as simply ##|V\rangle## - no superposition. But it's the same state either way, and there's no more magic involved than in noting that we can write "5" or "3+2" and it's the same number either way.

In practice we generally try to choose a basis that make the problem at hand easy. If we're planning to send a photon through a vertical polarizer at some stage of our experiment we'll probably want to use the ##|H\rangle##,##|V\rangle## basis just because we can read the probability amplitude for passing through the filter directly from the state. In this basis the state will look like ##\alpha|V\rangle+\beta|H\rangle## and the probability amplitude will be ##\alpha##. If instead we chose to use the ##|45\rangle##,##|-45\rangle## basis we'd have to do some extra algebra to get the same result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K