How Does Re[s]>0 Relate to Laplace Sine Transform Conditions?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter back2square1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace Sine Transform
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
back2square1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
[itex]L[sin(at)]=\frac{a}{s^{2}+a^{2}}, Re<s>>0</s>[/itex]

[itex]L[e^{kt}]=\frac{1}{s-k}, s>k[/itex]
[itex]L[e^{-kt}]=\frac{1}{s+k}, s<-k[/itex]

[itex]L[sin(at)]=\frac{1}{2i}L[e^{iat}-e^{-iat}][/itex]
[itex]=\frac{1}{2i}L[e^{iat}]-L[e^{-iat}][/itex]
Using the above relations
[itex]=\frac{1}{2i}[\frac{1}{s-ia}-\frac{1}{s+ia}], s>ia, s<-ia[/itex]

The problem is that I don't understand, how s>ia and s<-ia could imply that Real part of s>0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Complex numbers are not ordered,
s>ia and s<-ia
does not make sense.
Real part of s>0
Is needed to assure the existence of the integral.