MHB How Does the Constant '2' Arise in Binomial Theorem Equalities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gladeligen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the constant '2' in the context of the binomial theorem. The equality in question relates to the sum of binomial coefficients, which equals 2 raised to the power of n. This is explained through combinatorial proofs, where the left side counts subsets of a set, leading to the conclusion that each element can either be included or excluded, resulting in 2 choices per element. Various proof methods exist, including induction and differentiation, but combinatorial reasoning is highlighted as particularly intuitive. Overall, the constant '2' arises from the binary nature of subset formation in a set of size n.
gladeligen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6378

Hi!

My first post!

I was wondering if anyone could explain this equality in words?
I do not understand how the k became a constant (2) on the right side?Best
Flippa
 

Attachments

  • 2017-01-30 (2).png
    2017-01-30 (2).png
    5.6 KB · Views: 112
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome to the forum!

Proving equalities in words is not something mathematicians usually do. They usually prove equalities by a series of formulas. Perhaps the most intuitive type of proofs of similar facts is combinatorial proofs, where you consider a set and count its size in two different ways. You can find one such proof on StackExchange. It relies on the fact that $\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}=2^n$. This fact also has a combinatorial proof: $\binom{n}{k}$ is the number of subsets of size $k$ of the set of size $n$, so the left-hand side is the number of all subsets of a set of size $n$. This number is known to be $2^n$ because each of the $n$ elements either occurs in a subset or does not (thus $n$ consecutive independent yes/no choices). There are many other proofs of the same fact on the SE page and pages linked therein: some use induction, others differentiation, etc.
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K