How does the curvature of a fan blade affect its efficiency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter poptop94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fan
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The curvature of a fan blade, referred to as camber, significantly impacts its efficiency. Positive camber enhances airflow but increases drag, requiring more motor load at a given RPM. When a fan is reversed, the camber contributes to reduced airflow and increased drag, similar to how positively cambered aircraft perform poorly when inverted. Experimental validation using a cambered cardboard model demonstrates the differences in lift generation between positive and negative camber configurations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aerodynamic principles, specifically airfoil design
  • Familiarity with the concept of camber in aerodynamics
  • Basic knowledge of fan mechanics and motor load
  • Experience with experimental validation methods in aerodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research airfoil design principles focusing on camber effects
  • Explore the relationship between drag and lift in fan blade efficiency
  • Learn about experimental methods for testing aerodynamic properties
  • Investigate the design of symmetrical wings in aerobatic aircraft
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in fan design or aerodynamic efficiency optimization will benefit from this discussion.

poptop94
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am having a discussion with a co-worker. He doesn't believe that the curvature of a fan blade has any effect on efficiency. That one simple has to reverse the direction off rotation to get full flow in either direction. I know this isn't the case but am having a difficult time explaining and proving it. If anyone could provide me with a quick simple explanation that would be great!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well a fan blade is an airfoil and as such it's optimized for traveling in one direction. The curvature of the cross section of the blade is called camber and in aircraft it both increases the lift and also increases the drag. Typically, optimal camber in a wing is oriented such that somewhere near the center is the single high point of the cross section. This is called positive camber. Aircraft that are designed for aerobatics have symmetrical wings or nearly symmetrical so that when they are flying upside down the performance is not hindered. Aircraft with positive camber have poor inverted performance. In a fan the camber would serve to help move more air but the penalty is higher drag in the form of a higher load on the motor for a given RPM. Reversing the fan is akin to a positively cambered aircraft flying upside down. The camber is still adding a fair amount of drag to the fan motor but the camber is not serving to add any extra lift (in fact it is diminishing the lift) so less air is moved.

You can prove this experimentally by taking a piece of cardboard and forming it into a gentle camber (say a 4" wide piece with a 1" highpoint about 1/3 back from the leading edge) Sweep this cambered section through the air and note the lift it generates. Be sure to angle it about 5-10 degrees so that it has positive pitch. Now try the same thing only inverted. Again angle it so that it has positive pitch and you will see that there is no comparison. The reverse cambered airfoil hardly produces lift at all. Also harder to measure with just your hand but the drag (the resistance to being swept through the air) should be about the same whether negative or positive camber.

Marlin
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
20K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K