How Does the Inverse Bell Theorem Challenge Quantum Measurement Predictions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jk22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell Inverse Theorem
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
if we consider a separable measurement operator $$(A+A')\otimes (B-B')$$ then quantum mechanics predict the result is in [-2;2]

Whereas going to classical results would give in [-4;4]

This could indicate that going from measurement operator in the quantum realm to measurement results is maybe more complicated than just retranscripting the terms ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22, your post is not very coherent
jk22 said:
if we consider a separable measurement operator $$(A+A')\otimes (B-B')$$
Measurement operator represents measurements and in Bell test two measurement angles are always considered independent.
But measured pair of particles can be in separable or entangled state.

jk22 said:
then quantum mechanics predict the result is in [-2;2]

Whereas going to classical results would give in [-4;4]
Classical results can't give such values for CHSH inequality. Correlation values in inequality are not just arbitrary numbers but maximum numbers you can get when using shared initial variable for particle pair.
 
Well this operator is not Chsh but it shows a discrepancy between eigenvalues and the measurement results since the value of each operator A,A',B,B' is in {-1;1} whereas if i consider the operators like in a bell test they cannot reach such eigenvalues but not in general this is true my post is not very precise.
 
Last edited: