How does the movement of stars compare to the movement of planets

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the differences in movement between stars and planets, addressing both their apparent motion as observed from Earth and their actual motion in the galaxy. It includes considerations of observational phenomena, gravitational influences, and the dynamics of celestial bodies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that stars appear stationary due to their vast distances, while planets, being closer, move across the sky.
  • Others mention that most stars in the galaxy move at a relatively constant speed, while planets have varying velocities, with specific examples like Earth and Mercury provided.
  • One participant quotes a cosmologist to emphasize the motion of stars and the solar system within the Milky Way galaxy.
  • There is a claim that stars do not rotate like planets do, as planets revolve around stars.
  • Another participant asserts that stars do rotate, providing the Sun's rotation period as an example and discussing the orbital motion of the solar system around the galaxy's center.
  • Some participants highlight that planets can exhibit retrograde motion, which is not observed in stars, except in binary systems with small wobbles.
  • One participant introduces the concept of parallax, explaining how the Earth's movement causes nearby stars to appear to shift position.
  • Questions are raised about the forces causing the movement of galaxies within the local group, with gravitational interactions mentioned as a potential explanation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of stellar and planetary motion, with some agreeing on the apparent motion differences while others contest the rotational characteristics of stars compared to planets. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of these motions and the forces at play.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on observational phenomena that may depend on specific conditions, such as the distances involved and the methods of measurement. The discussion includes various assumptions about gravitational influences and the dynamics of celestial bodies that are not fully explored.

robno9
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
how does the movement of stars compare to the movement of planets
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not sure what you mean.
If you mean the apparent position ( where they ae in the sky) stars don't move very much - they are so far away that they appear stationary.
The planets are moving around the sun, they are much closer than the stars and so move across them.
 
Oddly enough, most stars in the galaxy however near or far from the center are moving at 210-240 km/s relative to the center. The Earth moves at just under 30 km/s relative to the Sun, while Mercury moves at 48 km/s. And just for good measure, the Andromeda galaxy is heading at us at 118 km/s (radial velocity), but the tangential velocity is a little bit uncertain. (see https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-64107.html). Oh, and the speed of light is as always 300,000 km/s.
 
To quote the famous cosmologist Eric Idle:

The sun and you and me and all the stars that we can see
Are moving at a million miles a day
In an outer spiral arm, at forty thousand miles an hour,
Of the galaxy we call the "Milky Way".

That's why I said 'apparent motion'
 
No. stars doesn't rotate just like planets do. normally planets revolve around stars instead.
 
Stars rotate just like planets - the sun's day is 609 hours or 25 Earth days long.
The sun ( and all the planets around it ) orbits the centre of our galaxy, taking around 250 million years an orbit.
Then our galaxy including all the stars and planets in it are moving in the local group of galaixies at even higher velocities.
 
In just terms of casual observation the planets move daily while the stars appear fixed in place. Several 'near by' stars do move quickly enough to be noticed with careful observation. A couple of the fastest movers are Arcturus and Barnard's Star.
 
One more note about the difference between the apparent position of stars vs. planets is that a planet can appear to change the direction it's going and then go backwards and then forwards again. As far as I know a star can't do this, except for maybe the tiny wobble of a binary star which wouln't have been observed by the naked eye.
 
So your point would be?
 
  • #10
What causes the local group to move? I mean, in a galaxy there's a black hole in the center that causes the stars to orbit around it, but in a cluster of galaxies, is there anything that can cause them to move so fast?
 
  • #11
Mental Gridlock said:
One more note about the difference between the apparent position of stars vs. planets is that a planet can appear to change the direction it's going and then go backwards and then forwards again. As far as I know a star can't do this, except for maybe the tiny wobble of a binary star which wouln't have been observed by the naked eye.
Actually, the seasonal movement of the Earth around the Sun causes nearby stars to shift apparent position. This is called parallax, and it is the only direct means of measuring the distance to objects outside our solar system. This indeed makes the apparent positions of nearby stars wobble back and forth, though the variations are small and require careful observation and measurement.
 
  • #12
Louis B said:
What causes the local group to move? I mean, in a galaxy there's a black hole in the center that causes the stars to orbit around it, but in a cluster of galaxies, is there anything that can cause them to move so fast?

Yes, each galaxy exerts gravitational force on every other galaxy in the local group, just like the supermassive black hole in the center of our own galaxy that causes the stars to orbit around it. Also, a cluster of galaxies can be gravitationally attracted to other galaxy clusters, which causes it to move across space if space isn't expanding too fast.
 
  • #13
Lymitra said:
Yes, each galaxy exerts gravitational force on every other galaxy in the local group, just like the supermassive black hole in the center of our own galaxy that causes the stars to orbit around it. Also, a cluster of galaxies can be gravitationally attracted to other galaxy clusters, which causes it to move across space if space isn't expanding too fast.

Ok thanks for clarifying. Haha I was under the impression that the galaxies didn't move...:rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K