How does the population of a southern city follow the exponential law?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The population of a southern city follows the exponential growth model, expressed as N(t) = N₀e^(kt). Given that the population doubles in 18 months, with a current population of 10,000, the growth constant k is calculated to be approximately 0.462098. Using this value, the projected population after 2 years is approximately 25,198. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the exponential growth formula in demographic studies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with natural logarithms and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of population dynamics and growth models
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of exponential growth in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about logistic growth models and their differences from exponential models
  • Explore the use of differential equations in modeling population growth
  • Investigate demographic transition models and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, demographers, urban planners, and anyone interested in understanding population growth dynamics through mathematical modeling.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{\textbf{6.8.7}}$ Kiaser HS

Population Growth The population of a southern city follows the exponential law
(a) If N is the population of the city and t is the time in years, express N as a function of t.$N(t)=N_0e^{kt}$
(b) If the population doubled in size over an 18-month period and the current population is 10,000, what will
the population be 2 years from now?
$\begin{array}{rl}
2&=e^{k(1.5)} \\
\ln 2&=k \cdot 1.5\\
\dfrac{\ln 2}{1.5}&=k\\
\therefore k&\approx0.462098\\
f(t)&\approx10000e^{0.462098\cdot 2}\\
&\approx 25198
\end{array}$

well anyway hopefully ok :unsure:
typos maybe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check the numbers but the logic is correct.

-Dan
 
Since you stated your basic equation as
$N(t)= N_oe^{kt}$
I would have preferred that you write
$2N_0= N_0e^{1.5k}$
before you divide both sides by $N_0$ to get
$2= e^{1.5k}$.

But I realize that is being petty!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K