How does the solution for the initial value problem change over time?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the initial value problem defined by the equation \( u_t + uu_x = 0 \) with specific initial conditions. The solutions are derived for different time intervals, leading to piecewise functions for \( u \) based on the values of \( x \) and \( t \). For \( t < 1 \), the solution is classical, while for \( t \geq 1 \), it transitions to a weak solution due to the emergence of a singularity at \( x = 2 \). The discussion raises questions about the inequalities involving \( \frac{3}{2}t + \frac{1}{2} \) and the implications of the singularity on the solution's behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the method of characteristics
  • Knowledge of classical and weak solutions in PDEs
  • Basic calculus, particularly in solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of characteristics for solving nonlinear PDEs
  • Research the concept of singularities in differential equations
  • Learn about classical versus weak solutions in the context of PDEs
  • Examine examples of initial value problems with piecewise solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with fluid dynamics, nonlinear PDEs, or anyone interested in the behavior of solutions to initial value problems in applied mathematics.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

We have the problem \begin{align*}&u_t+uu_x=0 \\ &u(x,0)=\begin{cases}2, & x<0 \\ 2-x, & x\in[0,1] \\1, & x>1\end{cases}\end{align*} We have the problems $$\frac{dx}{dt}=u \ \text{ and } \ \frac{du}{dt}=0$$ From the first one we get $x=ct+c_2$ and for $t=0$ we get $x_0=c_2$ and so we get $x_0=x-ct$.

From the second one we get $$\frac{dx}{dt}=u(x,t)=u(x_0,0)=\begin{cases}2, & x_0<0 \\ 2-x_0, & x_0\in[0,1] \\1 , & x_0>1\end{cases}$$ Solving for $x_0$ we get $$x_0=\begin{cases}x-2t, & x<2t \\ \frac{2t-x}{t-1}, & \frac{2t-x}{t-1} \in [0.1] \\ x-t, & x>t\end{cases}$$ So, $u$ is equal to $$u=\begin{cases}2, & x<2t \\ 2-\frac{2t-x}{t-1}, & \frac{x-2}{t-1}\in[0,1] \\1 , & x>t\end{cases}=\begin{cases}2, & x<2t \\ \frac{x-2}{t-1}, & \frac{x-2}{t-1}\in[0,1] \\1 , & x>t\end{cases}$$ For $t<1$ we get $$u=\begin{cases}2, & x<2t \\ \frac{x-2}{t-1}, & 2t\leq x\leq t+1 \\1 , & x>t\end{cases}$$ and for $t\geq 1$ we get $$u=\begin{cases}2, & x<2t \\ \frac{x-2}{t-1}, & t+1\leq x\leq 2t \\1 , & x>t\end{cases}$$ This can be simplified into $$u=\begin{cases}2, & x<2t \\1 , & x>t\end{cases}$$ or not?

According to the solution the case $t\geq 1$ is $$u=\begin{cases}2, & x<\frac{3}{2}t+\frac{1}{2} \\1 , & x>\frac{3}{2}t+\frac{1}{2}\end{cases}$$ But how do we get the inequalities with $\frac{3}{2}t+\frac{1}{2}$ ? (Thinking)Also... why do we have for $t<1$ a classical solution, but for $t>1$ a weak one?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Or can we not apply the method I did? (Thinking)
 
Hmm... doesn't the solution break down at $x=2$? (Wondering)

The initial value problem gives us solutions up to $x=2$, which is a singularity.
What happens after is effectively another initial value problem, which I think could go anywhere, including the given solution. (Thinking)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K