How Does the Weight at Point E Change When Rod AB Moves Horizontally?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chawki
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a rigid rod and a weight attached to a rope, exploring how the weight at point E changes when the rod is moved horizontally. The problem appears to involve concepts of geometry and tension in the rope.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the relationship between the movement of the rod and the resulting change in weight at point E. Questions arise regarding the geometry of the situation and the application of Pythagorean theorem.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem with various interpretations being discussed. Some participants are questioning the assumptions made about the geometry and the calculations involved, while others are attempting to clarify the relationships between different points in the setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the setup and the implications of moving the rod, indicating a need for clearer definitions of the points and relationships involved in the problem.

chawki
Messages
504
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure between AB is an upright rigid rod and flexible access to B from a rope which passes around the points C and D are located in the rollers for spot through the point E, where the rope is attached to weight.


Homework Equations


How much in section E, this weight will increase when the rod AB be translated into a horizontal plane


The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't get it..any hints?
 

Attachments

  • Rod.JPEG
    Rod.JPEG
    5.4 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
What are we trying to find here? tension in rope?

I don't see how the weight will increase by moving the rod down. In fact, it may drop seeing the elevation might change if u want to consider the minute gravity drop.
 
hi chawki! :smile:

i'm confused :confused:

is this just a geometry problem, to find how much higher M goes if the rope goes straight from C to the bottom of that arc, instead of only from C to B?
 
tiny-tim said:
hi chawki! :smile:

i'm confused :confused:

is this just a geometry problem, to find how much higher M goes if the rope goes straight from C to the bottom of that arc, instead of only from C to B?

Hello Tiny-tim :shy:
Actually it will go from B to the bottom, and yes it's probably to find how much higher that mass will go
 
then that's just subtracting one side of the triangle from another, isn't it?
 
If its the new heigth of the mass.

Lets call the tip of the rod when it's down F. the answer would be FC - BC

u can find the length of FC by using pythaegaros, u got AC and AF(AB)
 
Ok guys I'm lost...what triangle?
 
using the tip of the rod as F, the triangle would be FCA when the rod is horizontal.
 
Like this ?
 

Attachments

  • Copie de Rod.JPEG
    Copie de Rod.JPEG
    5.5 KB · Views: 413
  • #10
Yep and the amount E rises will simply be the difference between the tip of the rod and point C in both scenarios.
 
  • #11
Ok, if i get it right, the answer would be like this:
(0.5+x)2=2.52+22
we solve the equation x2+x-10=0
Delta=41
x1=-3.70 (it can't be because it's a negative value)
x2=2.70
so x=2.7m.
 

Attachments

  • Copie de Rod.JPEG
    Copie de Rod.JPEG
    6.3 KB · Views: 411
  • #12
am i right?
 
  • #13
chawki said:
In the figure between AB is an upright rigid rod and flexible access to B from a rope which passes around the points C and D are located in the rollers for spot through the point E, where the rope is attached to weight.

How much in section E, this weight will increase when the rod AB be translated into a horizontal plane

The question seems to be asking for the difference between the lengths CF and CB.

That's x = √(2.52+22) - 0.5

That's the same as your equation…

chawki said:
Ok, if i get it right, the answer would be like this:
(0.5+x)2=2.52+22
we solve the equation x2+x-10=0 …

… except for some reason you've turned it into a quadratic equation ……

why?? :confused:
 
  • #14
i just applied pythagore law
 
  • #15
chawki said:
i just applied pythagore law

yes, your first line was Pythagoras' law, but then you should just have taken the square root (that gets you my equation), not made a quadratic out of it :wink:
 
  • #16
but what do you mean ?
the point is the find x, isn't ?
 
  • #17
yes, but quickly
tiny-tim said:
That's x = √(2.52+22) - 0.5

:wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
5K