MHB How far above the ground is the tack?

  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground
veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Devon's bike has wheels that are 27 inches in diameter. After the front wheel picks up a tack, Devon rolls another 100 feet and stops. How far above the ground is the tack?

I did all my work carefully but the answer seems wierd.

circumference of tire :84.78 inches
total distance traveled is 1200 inches

1200 /84.78 = 14.154

84.78 : 0.154 = 360: X

X = 0.653

13.5cos0.653 = 13.4991

13.5 - 13.4991 = 0.000876

answer : 0.000876
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, it would help to use more digits of pi. Then 1200/(27$\pi$)=14.147 up to 3 decimal digits.

veronica1999 said:
84.78 : 0.154 = 360: X
This should be X / 360 = 0.147 (this is a fraction of the full circle). Then X = 52.958 degrees and the final answer is 5.368 inches.
 
Last edited:
Thank you! :D
Now I see my mistake.

Instead of 84.78 : 0.154 = 360 : X
the equation should have been 84.78 :13.056 = 360 :X
X = 55.4

1200/27pi = 14.147

84.78 : 12.46 = 360 :X
x= 52.958
 
Hello, veronica1999!

Devon's bike has wheels that are 27 inches in diameter.
After the front wheel picks up a tack, Devon rolls another 100 feet and stops.
How far above the ground is the tack?

I did all my work carefully but the answer seems weird.

Circumference of tire: 84.78 inches . This is wrong.
Total distance traveled is 1200 inches

1200 / 84.78 = 14.154

84.78 : 0.154 = 360 : X . This is wrong, too.

X = 0.653 . That is a VERY small angle, isn't it?

13.5cos0.653 = 13.4991

13.5 - 13.4991 = 0.000876

Answer: 0.000876
$\text{Circumference: }\:27\pi \:\approx\:84.82 $

$ \text{Then: }\:\dfrac{1200}{84.82} \:=\:14.1476\text{ revolutions} $

$\text{The wheel makes 14 revolutions and a fraction of a revolution.}$

$\text{That fraction is: }\:0.1476 \times 360^o \:=\:53.136^o $

$\text{Got it?} $
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top